Stanford ran Madoff-type scam

WASHINGTON - THE US financial regulator has accused Texas financier Allen Stanford of committing a multi-billion-dollar fraud like that of Wall Street swindler Bernard Madoff, documents showed on Saturday.

'For at least a decade, R. Allen Stanford and (his accomplice) James M. Davis, through companies they control ... executed a massive Ponzi scheme,' the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said in an amended complaint filed with a civil court in Dallas, Texas, a copy of which was obtained by AFP.

A Ponzi scheme, named after a crook in the 1920s, is a pyramid scheme where new investors' money is stolen to pay profits to existing clients.

New York financier Bernard Madoff was accused in December of masterminding a similar scheme for US$50 billion (S$75 billion).

'In carrying out the scheme, Stanford and Davis misappropriated billions of dollars of investor funds and falsified (Stanford International Bank) SIB's financial statements in an effort to conceal their fraudulent conduct,' the SEC added.

The SEC, which has launched accusations against Stanford, said that through their scheme, Stanford and Davis 'by February 2009, had misappropriated at least US$1.6 billion of investor money through bogus personal loans to Stanford and 'invested' an undetermined amount of investor funds in speculative, unprofitable private businesses controlled by Stanford.

'Stanford and Davis fabricated the performance of the bank's investment portfolio. Each month, Stanford and Davis decided on a pre-determined return on investment for SIB's portfolio,' charged the SEC.

'Using this pre-determined number, SIB's internal accountants reverse-engineered the bank's financial statements to report investment income that the bank did not actually earn.' The Houston Chronicle reported that Stanford owed massive back taxes.

Citing public records, the Texas newspaper said the Internal Revenue service (IRS) is seeking US$186 million in back taxes and penalties from Stanford.

'The bulk of that, US$107 million, stems from personal income taxes Stanford and his estranged wife owe from 2002 to 2004, court documents show.

The remainder, US$79 million, is on unpaid taxes from 1999 to 2001. The couple is disputing that in US Tax Court,' it added. -- AFP


Popular posts from this blog

Do you want to get into Goldman Sachs?

Financial Advice for Fresh College Grads

Is Diversification A Strategy Of The Past?