The terrible truth about the coming global redundancies

Sarah Butcher

It’s becoming harder to find a bank that hasn’t already laid off at least 10% of its staff. But with revenues still catastrophically low, headcount reductions to date could prove a pinprick compared to what’s coming next. Based on average pay per head for the year so far, we’ve calculated how many more people each bank would need to cut in order to maintain its international compensation ratio (compensation costs as a percentage of revenues) in line with 2007. The results range from the farcical (Merrill Lynch) to the disturbing (Credit Suisse), and the reassuring (Goldman and Morgan Stanley). While the vast majority of the cuts so far have been in the US and Europe, the layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio should make bankers in Asia nervous about the future, too.

Merrill Lynch

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $834m; 2007 – $19,442m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,170m; 2007 – $11,564m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 1,339%; 2007 – 59%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 60,900; 2007 – 64,200

Average comp per head: 2008 – $183k

Layoffs over the past year: 3,300

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 58,195

Credit Suisse (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF2,736m; 2007 – CHF16,217m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF5,682m; 2007 – CHF8,111m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 207%; 2007 – 50%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 21,300; 2007 – 20,399

Average comp per head: CHF266k (US$228k)

Layoffs over the past year: None; 1,000 staff added*

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 16,161

Deutsche Bank

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – €6,102m; 2007 – €14,620m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – €3,250m; 2007 – €5,217m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 53%, 2007 – 36%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 15,574; 2007 – 17,215

Average comp per head: 2008 – €209k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,668

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,130

UBS

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – minus CHF21,418m; 2007 – CHF11,065m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF4,589m; 2007 – CHF8,326m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – unquantifiable; 2007 – 75.2%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 18,901; 2007 – 22,666

Average comp per head: 2008 – CHF243k (US$208k)

Layoffs over the past year: 3,765**

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: Everyone

JPMorgan (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $12,516m; 2007 – $14,998m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $6,535m; 2007 – $6,404m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 52%; 2007 – 43%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 30,989; 2007 – 25,961

Average comp per head: 2008 – $211k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 5,298 staff added

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,647

Morgan Stanley

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $22,881m; 2007 – $28,476m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $10,726m; 2007 – $13,365m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 46.9%; 2007 – 46.9%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 46,383; 2007 – 47,713

Average comp per head: $231k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,330

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

Goldman Sachs

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $23,800m; 2007 – $35,246m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,424m; 2007 – $16,918m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 48%; 2007 – 48%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 32,569; 2007 – 29,905

Average comp per head: 2008 – $351k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 2,664 staff added***

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

• *Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 500 layoffs announced in October

• ** Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307; excluding 1,901 layoffs announced in October

• ***Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 3,200 layoffs announced in October

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers A grim report prepared by the Russian Northern Fleet for Prime Minister Putin is stating today that the catastrophic earthquake that has devastated the Island of Haiti was the ‘clear result’ of a United States Navy test of one of its ‘earthquake weapons’ planned to be used by the Americans upon the Persian Nation of Iran but had gone ‘horribly wrong’. The Northern Fleet has been monitoring US Naval movements and activities in the Caribbean since 2008 when the Americans announced their intention to re-establish their Forth Fleet that had been disbanded in 1950, and which was responded to by the Motherland when later that year a Russian flotilla led by nuclear powered cruiser Peter the Great began their first exercises in this region since the ending of the Cold War. Though virtually unknown to the American people, the use, and perfection, of earthquake weapon technology has a decade’s long history that began with the former Sov
Read more

I'm an accountant, I hate my job, but seriously, I wouldn’t know what else to do

I was born to be a lot of things, but being an accountant isn't one of them. In my heart of hearts I have always known this, but for some stupid subconscious reason, I have always ignored it. Why? Well...um...err...I didn’t know what else to do. How many people faced with the same predicament of deciding on a profession upon graduating used “not really knowing what to do” as their guiding compass? Blink. Ten years have passed and you’re left wondering, how did I get here? In this cubicle? Doing something I cannot stand (and I’m not even honestly good at), with people I quite frankly don’t really care about? For me that was accounting, a profession that conjures numerous clichés, such as boring, bean counting, personality not needed, number crunching etc etc. These have now evolved and have been replaced by repetition, reconciliations, long hours, fudging figures, high turnover, Enron and even more reconciliations. R-E-S-P-E-C-T But please don’t get me wrong, I have the utmost respe
Read more

Have We Reached a Top?

By James Kostohryz It's never been my position that the flow of fundamental news would turn from positive to negative overnight and in a total fashion. The world simply doesn't work that way. When I terminated my core long position a couple of weeks ago for reasons explained in�Ten Reasons the Countertrend Rally May Be Over,�I outlined a series of factors I believe may manifest in the later half of 2009 and the first half of 2010. Indeed, most of these factors will be more back-end loaded, as negative factors tend to build on one another and gain momentum in time through the medium of psychology and social mood. It's my view that the flow of economically relevant events�-- and perceptions of these events --are in the early stages of a transition. In this case, a transition means the flow of relatively good news will tend to wane somewhat while there's an uptick in relatively bad news. This is what one would expect at a top. However, it's to be expected that during t
Read more