The Biases Investors Suffer From

I personally feel a host of people lose money in their investment not because of the capricious nature of the stock market but because of biases in the important investment decisions they make. Many investors unwittingly suffer from one form of bias or the other. In this discussion, I will draw the reader’s attention to the various forms of biases that investors suffer from. The biases investors primarily suffer from are: overconfidence, representativeness, conservatism, narrow framing and ambiguity aversion.

Self-attribution bias contributes to overconfidence bias. In self-attribution bias the investor is very quick to attribute the good results of investment decisions to himself and blame others or come up with excuses when things don’t work according to plan. This leads to overconfidence in one’s ability to select the right shares for a portfolio. It also leads to an irrational behaviour of not sufficiently diversifying one’s portfolio to reduce risk. Overconfidence bias supports the over-reaction hypothesis which states that markets rise too high when they rise and falls too low when they fall. When an overconfident person thinks the market will rise he invests enthusiastically, hence causing the market to rise more than necessary. On the other hand, a feeling that the market will fall leads to a progressively decreasing investment which causes the market to fall more than necessary. Overconfidence also explains why some investors trade more often, although they have to pay high charges every time they buy or sell shares.

Representativeness is to do with one projecting past successes or failures as also happening in the future. Thus some investors will invest a lot in a particular share just because it performed well in the past, or invest less in a security because it underperformed in the past. This sort of action or decision takes place in spite of concrete evidence that future performances cannot be guaranteed by past performances on the stock market. It is a form of bias.

Conservatism refers to a slow response to information or events. Research shows that a lot of investors only buy shares when it is about to peak in price and sells when it is just about to trough.

Narrow framing has to do with considering things from a smaller perspective than it should be. Looking at a long-term investment from a short-term perspective, is a good example. Some investors anxiously monitor daily changes in the prices of securities in a portfolio targeted at achieving an objective in 40 years’ time. Others as a result of this bias consider the volatility of the constituent securities of their portfolios, instead of looking at the risk of the portfolio as a whole. This can result in a rather meager investment, since individual securities in a portfolio tend to be more volatile than the portfolio itself.

Bias of ambiguity concerns investors’ preparedness to invest only in companies they know more about. A lot of investors prefer investing in companies in their own countries, even if investment in other countries can provide higher returns and also help to reduce risk.

One bias that is very closely related to narrow framing is that of retreivability, in which investors pay more attention to information that they can readily recall. Some investors will only support statements that coincide with their views, rejecting those that oppose the notion they hold. Others suffer from illusion of control. Some investors feel they are really in control of the investment situation, when in actual fact they are not. This type of bias explains why many investors pursue actively managed funds, irrespective of research findings that tracker funds outperform actively managed ones in the long-term.

Great dividends can be expected if the investor will use the above-mentioned biases as a checklist when making important investment decisions. Biases can warp the decision making mind of an investor, and foster irrationality and lack of objectivity. Taking appropriate measures to eschew biases is the first step towards investment success.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers A grim report prepared by the Russian Northern Fleet for Prime Minister Putin is stating today that the catastrophic earthquake that has devastated the Island of Haiti was the ‘clear result’ of a United States Navy test of one of its ‘earthquake weapons’ planned to be used by the Americans upon the Persian Nation of Iran but had gone ‘horribly wrong’. The Northern Fleet has been monitoring US Naval movements and activities in the Caribbean since 2008 when the Americans announced their intention to re-establish their Forth Fleet that had been disbanded in 1950, and which was responded to by the Motherland when later that year a Russian flotilla led by nuclear powered cruiser Peter the Great began their first exercises in this region since the ending of the Cold War. Though virtually unknown to the American people, the use, and perfection, of earthquake weapon technology has a decade’s long history that began with the former Sov
Read more

I'm an accountant, I hate my job, but seriously, I wouldn’t know what else to do

I was born to be a lot of things, but being an accountant isn't one of them. In my heart of hearts I have always known this, but for some stupid subconscious reason, I have always ignored it. Why? Well...um...err...I didn’t know what else to do. How many people faced with the same predicament of deciding on a profession upon graduating used “not really knowing what to do” as their guiding compass? Blink. Ten years have passed and you’re left wondering, how did I get here? In this cubicle? Doing something I cannot stand (and I’m not even honestly good at), with people I quite frankly don’t really care about? For me that was accounting, a profession that conjures numerous clichés, such as boring, bean counting, personality not needed, number crunching etc etc. These have now evolved and have been replaced by repetition, reconciliations, long hours, fudging figures, high turnover, Enron and even more reconciliations. R-E-S-P-E-C-T But please don’t get me wrong, I have the utmost respe
Read more

Have We Reached a Top?

By James Kostohryz It's never been my position that the flow of fundamental news would turn from positive to negative overnight and in a total fashion. The world simply doesn't work that way. When I terminated my core long position a couple of weeks ago for reasons explained in�Ten Reasons the Countertrend Rally May Be Over,�I outlined a series of factors I believe may manifest in the later half of 2009 and the first half of 2010. Indeed, most of these factors will be more back-end loaded, as negative factors tend to build on one another and gain momentum in time through the medium of psychology and social mood. It's my view that the flow of economically relevant events�-- and perceptions of these events --are in the early stages of a transition. In this case, a transition means the flow of relatively good news will tend to wane somewhat while there's an uptick in relatively bad news. This is what one would expect at a top. However, it's to be expected that during t
Read more