Three Ways to Boost Your Investment Returns

ByMike Woelflein, Special to TheStreet.com

If you read Part One and Part Two of our series on boosting your income, you may be making and hanging on to more money.

The next step is growing the money you've got.

Kicking up your returns by a percentage point or two can brighten your financial outlook, big-time. For example, let's say you invest $500 per month in a 401(k), with a 3% employer match. If your investments generate a 7% average annual return, you'll have $882,049 in 30 years. Juice your returns to 9%, and you'll end up with $1,285,785 -- an increase of more than $400,000.

The extra money could make an enormous difference in your retirement income. A $1.29 million nest egg would allow $51,000 in inflation-adjusted annual withdrawals, assuming you take financial advisers' standard advice and withdraw 4% of your retirement savings each year. (Myriad studies have found that a 4% maximum withdrawal rate gives retirement savings the best chance of lasting at least 30 years.)

By comparison, the $882,000 portfolio would allow annual withdrawals of just $35,000. (You can run your own calculations here.)

"You often hear how a dollar saved today can make a big difference tomorrow," says Rick Shapiro, a managing member of Investment and Financial Counselors in West Hartford, Conn. "That's true for every dollar your portfolio earns, too."

Here's how to maximize your investment returns:

Cut Expenses

Every dollar spent managing your money is a dollar missed, not just from today's balance but from tomorrow's growth -- so cutting costs can have a major impact on your returns.

Say you invest $20,000 in an actively managed, no-load stock fund that earns the stock-market average of 11% per year for 10 years. A 1.5% expense ratio would force you to forgo nearly $8,000 in fees and lost earnings, leaving your investment worth $48,823 after a decade. Lower your expense ratio to 0.25% -- for example, by investing through an index fund -- and your costs would shrink to about $1,400, boosting the value of your investment in 10 years to $55,385.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has a calculator that enables you to compare funds and see how their expense ratios might affect your portfolio over time.

Spice Up Your Portfolio

In general, the more risk you're willing to take, the higher your returns will be over the long run. Goosing your stock allocation even a bit might help you amass a good deal more money over time.

Vanguard has charted 10 different asset allocation models for the period from 1926 through 2006. Here's some of what the company found:

With More Risk, More Reward

Average returns for the period 1926-2006
Asset allocation Average annual return Best Year Worst Year
50% stocks, 50% bonds 8.50% 32.30% -22.50%
60% stocks, 40% bonds 8.90% 36.70% -26.60%
70% stocks, 30% bonds 9.40% 41.10% -30.7
80% stocks, 20% bonds 9.80% 45.4 -34.9
100% stocks 10.50% 54.20% -43.10%
Source: Vanguard

The point isn't that a 100% stock portfolio is for everyone. Indeed, the all-stock portfolio lost 43.1% during its worst year (compared with a loss of just 8.1% for an all-bond portfolio's worst year) -- a collapse most investors in or approaching retirement couldn't afford.

But the more time you have until you need your money, they more time you have to recover from potential losses. History shows that the stock market moves inexorably upward: The S&P 500 has never lost ground over any 20-year period since at least 1926. So if you have decades before you'll need to draw on your savings, short-term downturns shouldn't disrupt your finances one whit -- meaning you can afford to ride them out in pursuit of greater long-term gains. As you approach the time when you'll need to withdraw your funds, you can shift the money you'll need into bonds and cash.

Diversify

Meanwhile, you can increase risk-adjusted returns by holding stocks of various sizes, industries and nationalities, and bonds with a variety of term lengths and credit qualities. Those different types of investments tend to move in different patterns --one might surge while another plunges -- helping you smooth out your portfolio's short-term fluctuations while pursuing long-term growth.

"If you want more return, you're going to have take more risk," Shapiro says. "But you can manage that risk with a fully diversified portfolio. In the long term, nothing is going to keep up with a fully diversified portfolio."


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers A grim report prepared by the Russian Northern Fleet for Prime Minister Putin is stating today that the catastrophic earthquake that has devastated the Island of Haiti was the ‘clear result’ of a United States Navy test of one of its ‘earthquake weapons’ planned to be used by the Americans upon the Persian Nation of Iran but had gone ‘horribly wrong’. The Northern Fleet has been monitoring US Naval movements and activities in the Caribbean since 2008 when the Americans announced their intention to re-establish their Forth Fleet that had been disbanded in 1950, and which was responded to by the Motherland when later that year a Russian flotilla led by nuclear powered cruiser Peter the Great began their first exercises in this region since the ending of the Cold War. Though virtually unknown to the American people, the use, and perfection, of earthquake weapon technology has a decade’s long history that began with the former Sov
Read more

I'm an accountant, I hate my job, but seriously, I wouldn’t know what else to do

I was born to be a lot of things, but being an accountant isn't one of them. In my heart of hearts I have always known this, but for some stupid subconscious reason, I have always ignored it. Why? Well...um...err...I didn’t know what else to do. How many people faced with the same predicament of deciding on a profession upon graduating used “not really knowing what to do” as their guiding compass? Blink. Ten years have passed and you’re left wondering, how did I get here? In this cubicle? Doing something I cannot stand (and I’m not even honestly good at), with people I quite frankly don’t really care about? For me that was accounting, a profession that conjures numerous clichés, such as boring, bean counting, personality not needed, number crunching etc etc. These have now evolved and have been replaced by repetition, reconciliations, long hours, fudging figures, high turnover, Enron and even more reconciliations. R-E-S-P-E-C-T But please don’t get me wrong, I have the utmost respe
Read more

Have We Reached a Top?

By James Kostohryz It's never been my position that the flow of fundamental news would turn from positive to negative overnight and in a total fashion. The world simply doesn't work that way. When I terminated my core long position a couple of weeks ago for reasons explained in�Ten Reasons the Countertrend Rally May Be Over,�I outlined a series of factors I believe may manifest in the later half of 2009 and the first half of 2010. Indeed, most of these factors will be more back-end loaded, as negative factors tend to build on one another and gain momentum in time through the medium of psychology and social mood. It's my view that the flow of economically relevant events�-- and perceptions of these events --are in the early stages of a transition. In this case, a transition means the flow of relatively good news will tend to wane somewhat while there's an uptick in relatively bad news. This is what one would expect at a top. However, it's to be expected that during t
Read more