THE BLOG'S THREE MAIN OBJECTIVES:
QUICK LINKS FOR PASSIVE INCOME CREATION:

Sunday, 30 November 2008

China losing competitive edge

BEIJING - PRESIDENT Hu Jintao has warned China's economy is losing its competitive edge amid the ongoing global financial crisis, state media reported on Sunday.

Mr Hu made the downbeat remarks on Saturday at a meeting of the Communist Party's elite Political Bureau, according to party mouthpiece the People's Daily.

'There is a clear slowdown in global economic growth, with a marked weakening in external demand, and China is losing its competitive advantages,' he was quoted as saying.

'Global competition is intensifying and the pressure from protectionism is increasing.'

In October, China's export growth slowed to 19.2 per cent from 21.5 per cent in September.

'The global financial crisis continues to expand, and the external conditions facing our economy are getting more complex,' Mr Hu said, according to the paper.

'The impact of the global financial crisis on the Chinese economy continues to deepen.'

China's economy, the world's fourth-largest, expanded by 9.0 per cent in the third quarter, the lowest level in more than five years.

The World Bank said last week it expected the Chinese economy to grow by 9.2 per cent in 2008 before hitting a 19-year low of 7.5 per cent in 2009. -- AFP

Misconceptions About Investing

Surprise! Even your young adults don't know everything, and they could use guidance on when and where to invest -- especially in these tough times.
By Janet Bodnar

I recently wrote about a conversation I had with my 25-year-old son, John. John had just read a story in Kiplinger's Personal Finance about a young investor named Deirdre, also 25, who had amassed more than $100,000 in Vanguard index mutual funds. "How come you never told me about mutual funds?" he asked.

Having grown up with a mother who writes about kids and money, my children are accustomed to being the subjects of amusing anecdotes in this column. But one reader wasn't amused. "You've spent more than 15 years writing about kids and money and you apparently never told your son about mutual funds," wrote Rob from Knoxville, Tenn. "I almost found myself speechless."

Rob, let me explain. John and I had discussed mutual funds; in fact, his Roth IRA was invested in one of the same index funds as Deirdre's money.

John thought that because Deirdre had a much bigger balance, there was some gonzo fund that I had neglected to tell him about. The real difference was that Deirdre had been living at home with her parents and socking away more than 60% of her income during the bull market of the early 2000s.

John also thought that I had steered him wrong by suggesting he stash his money in an IRA, which was earmarked for retirement, instead of an investment he could tap more easily -- say, to pay for grad school.

That kicked off yet another mother-son discussion, in which I explained the benefits of a Roth IRA: John can get access to his contributions at any time, and he can even withdraw earnings to pay for education expenses without incurring a penalty.

The point is that even with 25-year-olds you have to take things one step at a time. Basic information goes a long way.

With the stock market in the tank, that point was brought home to me yet again when I told all three of my twentysomething kids that they should contribute to their IRAs. "Shouldn't I wait till the market starts going up?" John asked. Nope, I told him, buy now when stocks are on sale (see Start Investing in Three Simple Steps).

I did tell him I'd give him a pass this year because he's borrowing money to pay grad-school tuition. So I was surprised a couple of weeks ago when he informed me he'd kicked in $500 to his IRA after all.

Assuming that the stock market eventually snaps back to its historical average return of 10% a year, that tiny contribution of $500 will grow to $26,850 by the time John's ready to retire.

And I have no doubt that the lessons he continues to learn about saving and investing will make him a millionaire, perhaps several times over.

Buying a car? Read this

Drawn by lower car prices and certificate of entitlement (COE) rates at record-low levels, potential buyers have been flooding showrooms to check out their dream set of wheels.

The buying frenzy was ignited on Nov 19, when the COE premium for cars with engine size up to 1,600cc crashed to $2, a level never seen before.

Said Ms Helen Neo, head of consumer banking at Maybank Singapore: 'With the Category A (below 1,600cc) COE at a record low of $2, new cars are currently priced at attractive levels.

'Furthermore, with the sharp plunge in petrol prices to a 20-month low, it is definitively a good time to consider buying a car.'

How does a lower COE contribute to savings for the buyer?

The fall in COE to $2 from $10,455 early this month has led many car dealers to cut car prices by between $3,000 and $6,000 for the smaller-car segment.

For instance, car dealer Borneo Motors has cut prices by up to $6,000, bringing its cheapest model, the Toyota Vios, to below $44,000.

Honda agent Kah Motor has cut the Civic's price by $2,700 to $72,500.

Motor Traders Association (MTA) president Tan Kheng Hwee said that car prices are lower today than at any other time in the last 10 years.

This can translate to lower monthly instalments too.

Ms Neo said that lower car prices mean that any loan taken is likely to be smaller too. Hence, the cost of financing would be correspondingly lower.

She gave this example: Let us say the car price was lowered by $5,000.

Assuming a corresponding reduction in loan amount by $5,000, this would translate into monthly savings of about $70 for a seven-year loan.

Besides the lower cost of financing, Ms Tan said that another reason to own a new car is that today's cars have improved features.

'Dollar for dollar, buyers today are also getting a superior product in terms of features and quality.'

For example, a new Honda Civic offers more space, better performance and higher horsepower, plus improved fuel economy compared to the last-generation Civic model, she added.

'And it costs less to buy today. It's a good deal.'

Still, you cannot ignore how the world is facing a prolonged financial downturn and the looming threat of more job cuts.

To add to the gloomy outlook, anecdotal evidence points to an emerging trend of bankruptcy arising from defaulting on car loans. Recent statistics also suggest a rising trend of cars being repossessed here because of loan defaults.

So, before you go ahead and book a car, consider these first:

1. Positive cash flow

Given the current economic conditions, Mr Tony Ong, director at IPP Financial Advisers, cautions potential car buyers to ensure that they have a positive cash flow for at least one to two years first.

This means an adequate cash flow to cater for living and household expenses and the servicing of the car loan.

Mr Leong Chin Huah, a senior consultant at wealth management firm Providend, said that as a guide, the total amount of your gross income that goes towards servicing all loans, and not just the car loan, should be capped at below 35 per cent. Avoid having to dip into your emergency funds.

2. Costs of owning a car

Mr Leong said consumers should consider other costs on top of the purchase price of the car.

These include the car loan (if you take up a loan), regular maintenance costs, fuel charges, road tax, insurance premium, Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) charges and parking fees.

He noted that while car taxes were reduced by about 15 per cent recently, there are also more ERP gantries being erected.

3. Needs versus wants

Ask yourself if you really need a car or is it just to pander to your desires. After all, it is a big-ticket item.

Ms Tan of the MTA said you should consider if you and your family are going to need a car for the next five to 10 years.

'If so, then this is a good time to buy when prices are at a historical low,' she said.

'Consider also that the COE quota will definitely be cut come April next year, so all other things being equal, car prices should trend up from here.'

4. Determining the type and size of car

IPP's Mr Ong suggests using your budget and potential usage of the car to help determine the type and size of car you should get.

5. Buying from an established firm

In these times, it is important to buy from an established company, be it cars or any big-ticket item, said Ms Tan. This is because you want to be sure that your deposit or down payment is safe.

In particular for cars, you want to be sure that the distributor that sold you the car will be around to deliver on promises on repair and warranty services down the road.

6. Should you choose the highest car loan available?

The advice from most financial experts is buyers should fork out a higher down payment if they can afford to, so as to reduce the amount of interest they have to pay.

This means that even if you can get a car loan of up to 100 per cent of the purchase price, do not go for it.

7. Find out the 'effective' loan interest rate

While it might make sense to take up a car loan, experts point out that many buyers are not aware that the 'effective' or real interest rate of a car loan works out to be higher than the published loan interest rate.

For example, a loan amount of $40,000 over seven years at a 2.5 per cent interest rate attracts an effective rate of about 4.8 per cent per annum.

This is because interest is payable on the original principal and not on a reducing principal, Mr Leong of Providend pointed out.

8. Check around for suitable loan packages

Loan packages vary, so buyers should take their time to suss out good deals.

The current economic climate has led to slower car sales, so car distributors are hungry for customers.

Market observers noted that current loan packages are about 3.35 per cent for a one- to six-year loan package and 3.5 per cent for a seven- to 10-year loan package.

At some car distributors, cash rebates are being offered when you take up a loan.

For instance, Malayan Motors, which distributes Jaguars and Bentleys, offers a cash rebate of 8 per cent of the loan. This means that for a $100,000 car loan, you will get $8,000 in cash.

At Kah Motor, the cash rebate is based on 30 per cent of the total loan interest. This works out to a $5,000 cash rebate for a $70,000 loan with a seven-year tenure.

However, consumers who wish to enjoy cash rebates should be aware that they have to refund the entire rebate if they wish to redeem their loans fully within the first two years. Loan interest rates for packages tied with cash rebates are also higher.

At Malayan Motors and Kah Motor, the cash rebate package comes with a higher 3.5 per cent per annum interest rate and a longer loan tenure of seven years and above.

On the other hand, those who do not wish to take the offer of a cash rebate can enjoy a lower interest rate of 2.28 per cent per annum at Malayan Motors and 2.2 per cent per annum at Kah Motor.

The latter offers 100 per cent financing, while Malayan Motors offers financing for up to 95 per cent of the cost of the car, subject to the bank's approval.

The bottom line: The choice of a suitable loan package depends on what you are comfortable paying each month.

9. What if you are an existing car owner - should you sell your car to get a new one?

Ms Tan said you should compare the depreciation of your current car and the terms of your current car loan to those of the new car you are considering.

Check the amount of outstanding loan payable, the resale price of your car and do your sums. Do note that new cars are also under warranty and maintenance costs tend to be lower.

In addition, Ms Neo suggested checking your existing car's COE and scrap rebate. The latter is also known as the Preferential Additional Registration Fee (Parf) rebate and it is the sum your existing car can fetch when it is de-registered.

'If the existing car has high COE and Parf rebates, which will translate into higher resale value of the car, it may be worthwhile to consider selling it off and switching to a new car,' she said.

You can check your rebates at the Land Transport Authority (LTA) website, www.onemotoring.com.sg by clicking on 'LTA e-Services', then 'online enquiries' and then 'Parf/COE rebate' and keying in the required information.

A higher resale value means you have more to channel towards the down payment of the new car.

Another factor to consider is the higher running cost of your existing car - due to lower petrol efficiency, higher servicing or maintenance costs and higher parts replacement costs due to wear and tear - compared to that of a new car.

However, it is generally not worthwhile switching to a new car if the existing car is less than a year old. As it is still very new, it would normally be within the warranty period of three years and running and maintenance costs will generally not be high. You won't enjoy much savings by switching.

10. Find out your new car's potential COE rebate

Singapore Vehicle Traders Association president Neo Nam Heng said consumers should be aware that if their new cars came with a $2 COE, the refund on the COE five years down the road will only be half that, or $1.

This applies even if the dealer has sold you a car that comes with an Open Category COE - which can be used for any vehicle type - of about $6,000.

This is because the LTA will base the rebate on the $2 COE, which is the lower of the two premiums.

'It is better to wait for the next COE bidding and bid for the actual Category A, so there will be no confusion leading to any potential disputes with your dealers,' he advised.

Saturday, 29 November 2008

S'porean hostage killed

From Straits Times.com

http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_308041.html


THE Mumbai terror attacks claimed a Singaporean victim when lawyer Lo Hwei Yen, 28, was confirmed among the dead last night.

She is the first Singaporean to die in a terrorist attack.

The tragic task of identifying her body fell to her husband, Mr Michael Puhaindran, who had flown to Mumbai on Thursday night.

The couple held their wedding in Bali only in June last year.

Mr Puhaindran, 37, last heard from his wife through two phone calls she made to him on Thursday after being taken hostage at The Oberoi Trident Hotel.

She had gone to Mumbai on Wednesday to attend a business seminar and it was meant to be only a one-night trip.

Last night, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that the worst had happened.

Her body, found on the 19th floor of the hotel, was identified at 9.35pm Singapore time by Mr Puhaindran, accompanied by the High Commissioner and an aunt.

She was among 24 Oberoi hotel hostages found dead yesterday.

Acting Prime Minister S. Jayakumar said in a statement last night that he and his Cabinet colleagues were painfully saddened, and added that all Singaporeans shared the family's grief.

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong also expressed sadness, saying that he had attended the couple's wedding last year.

Ms Lo's father-in-law, Mr Stanley Puhaindran, has been a long-time grassroots leader in Mr Goh's Marine Parade constituency. SM Goh visited the family last night.

Over at the home of Ms Lo's parents in Lower Delta, her younger sisters Hwei Shan, 25, and Hwei Rong, 23, had been waiting anxiously all day for news.

Ms Lo was the eldest of the three children of a businessman and housewife. Her father has been away on business but was returning home, the family said.

A law graduate of the National University of Singapore, Ms Lo worked with Stephenson Harwood, a foreign law firm based here.

She called her husband twice from Mumbai on Thursday, Hwei Shan told The Straits Times.

In the first call at 2am on Thursday, she said that she had heard gunfire and the hotel staff had told her to move to another level.

In her second call, at about 6am, she said that she had been taken hostage.

Foreign Affairs Ministry official Jai S. Sohan confirmed last night that Ms Lo had passed her husband a message from her captors.

An Indian news channel had reported that the terrorists had held the woman at gunpoint and ordered her to tell the Singapore Government to tell the Mumbai authorities to refrain from acting against them, or she would lose her life.

Mr Sohan said the ministry conveyed the message to the Indian authorities at a very senior level.

'We ask for your understanding as we could not confirm this earlier as the situation at that time was fluid and fast-evolving. It was also not appropriate at that time for us to do so for operational reasons,' he added.

Ms Lo's husband left for Mumbai on Thursday evening, accompanied by an aunt and ministry officials.

Family members in Singapore kept monitoring the news closely hoping for any hint that she might be safe.

But they began to fear the worst at about 5pm yesterday, when her husband got word that her wallet and handbag had been found.

He and his aunt were with Singapore diplomats keeping vigil near the Oberoi when news came that more bodies had been found inside.

They were led inside to identify the body and came out looking shaken.

Mr Puhaindran and Foreign Ministry officials broke the tragic news to the family here at 10pm, just before the ministry held a press conference that was broadcast live on television.

'She was bubbly, cheerful and very protective of us as the older sister,' said Hwei Shan.

Friday, 28 November 2008

Recession-Proof Your Job

In the current economy downturn, we may want to refer to the famous quote from John Kennedy, 35th President of the United States:
“Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.”

It may be appropriate here to modify this famous saying as follows:
“Ask not what your company can do for you - ask what you can do for your company.”

Why? Because if your company does not make it, neither will you. You lose your job and if you are lucky, you find your next job quickly. But ask yourself: how likely will that be during the current market situation.

Another timely quote from Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States:
“Whenever you are asked if you can do a job, tell 'em, 'Certainly I can!' Then get busy and find out how to do it."

Companies are struggling! In the United States, former leading brand names like GM, Ford and Chrysler are fighting for survival. Companies in Singapore are foreseeing a difficult time ahead. So, what should you do? Whine and wait for the worst or stand up for your company and live to fight another day? Below are some suggestions how you can stand up and make a difference to recession-proof yourself.

Attitude counts a lot.
It is all about attitude. In the current difficult time, the importance of attitude cannot be over-emphasized. Positive attitude will help boost morale and enhance harmony and unity. This is made more important during difficult times where morale is typically low.

Take a macro view/look at the whole picture.
Look at the company as a whole and see yourself as part of the whole company. Do not wait to be told to do something. Now is the crucial time when you should look hard around and help the company to be stronger to be able to secure the diminished available business.
Be aware of and anticipate the needs of your co-workers and other departments. If you come across an article that might be useful to your co-workers, send it to them with a note.

Think of ways to generate revenues or cut costs.
During an economy downturn, the opportunity to generate revenues is diminished. Even then, we should always pro-actively think of ways to generate revenues. It is only when we ‘give up’ and stop thinking that we get into trouble.
We should keep the cost factor firmly in mind and cut costs wherever possible. Whatever costs that can be postponed should be postponed. Differentiate between needs and wants. All the wants should be firmly put on hold.
Cutting costs means that you can offer a more competitive price to your customers. Cutting costs is different from cutting corners. It means doing things in a more efficient way and doing away with non-essential stuff, without any adverse effect to quality.

Make positive contributions.
Make positive contributions whenever possible. Think of all possible ways to make positive contributions, even if it is not in your area of responsibility. Share your ideas willingly and be helpful to everyone.

Talk up your contributions.
There is no need to boast about your contributions. But keeping silent about contributions is not going help either. Subtly mention how your contributions have helped and offer more help whenever possible.

Doing your job well will not help.
In good times, doing your job well may suffice. In the current difficult situation, doing well just is not enough. Why? Because of the diminished available business opportunity, we must do our job exceptionally well to be able win the projects.

Build a strong rapport with other departments.
Unity is strength. Unity enhances morale. This is more crucial during the current downturn when morale can be low.

Make yourself stand out. Strive to be leader in your industry.
In such difficult times, it becomes more essential be best as we are competing for a limited number of available projects in the market. You can write articles, do a presentation at a seminar or even make use of the current trend and use a blog.

Get your skills up to date.
Ask yourself. If your skill is outdated, how can you contribute to the company? During the downturn, normal people start to worry. Progressive people think of how to contribute to the company by upgrading their skills, in line with the company’s requirements. Doing so will demonstrate to your company your positive attitude.

Continue networking.
It is more about who you know than what you know. What you know is important of course, but who you know can go a long way to help you succeed in difficult times. With your strong network and through the network of your network, you will be surprised how much can be achieved. This is particularly true in the current difficult time.

Be visible.
Be visible. In such difficult times, the company needs all contributions it can get. Now is not the best time to go on long vacation. The risk is that you may return to find out your job has become redundant. Make yourself useful and visible. Offer whatever help you can to whichever department that needs help.

China says impact of global crisis deepening

By Joe Mcdonald, AP Business Writer
Impact of global crisis on China deepening, official warns job losses could fuel instability

BEIJING (AP) -- China's top economic planner warned Thursday that the impact of the global financial crisis is worsening and said rising job losses could fuel instability.

Beijing announced its biggest interest rate cut in 11 years on Wednesday to boost consumer and company spending, reflecting its growing urgency about reviving growth as it launches a multibillion-dollar stimulus package.

"This crisis is spreading all over the world and its impact on China's economy is deepening," Zhang Ping, chairman of the Cabinet's National Development and Reform Commission, said at a news conference. He said economic indicators for November were showing an "even faster decline," though he gave no details.

China's economic growth is expected to fall to about 9 percent this year, down from last year's 11.9 percent. That would be the fastest of any major economy, but Chinese leaders worry about possible unrest as unemployment rises, especially in export industries where factories are shutting down as global demand plummets.

"Excessive production halts and closing of enterprises will cause massive unemployment, which will lead to instability," Zhang said.

The 1.08 percentage-point cut in China's key one-year lending rate on Wednesday -- China's biggest rate cut since 1997 and the fourth in three months -- is "one of the essential measures to stimulate our economic growth," Zhang said.

Zhang said the 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion), two-year stimulus package announced Nov. 9 should add about 1 percentage point to China's growth rate. That was below the 2 percentage point increase forecast by independent analysts.

Zhang said Beijing will take steps to boost growth and ensure the economy continues to create jobs. But he did not respond to a question about whether Beijing is planning to enact additional stimulus plans.

A state newspaper reported last weekend that Zhang's agency is working on an additional stimulus package that is meant to supplement the Nov. 9 package with more spending on health, education and other social programs.

The main stimulus package calls for insulating China from the global downturn by injecting money into the economy through higher spending on construction of airports, highways and other projects. It is meant to spur domestic consumption.

The cut in the one-year lending rate to 5.58 percent, effective Thursday, is aimed at encouraging consumers and businesses to borrow and spend, which is seen as a more effective way to fuel growth than government spending.

The stimulus package includes 1.8 trillion yuan ($263 billion) in spending on airports, highways and other, 370 billion yuan ($54 billion) to improve infrastructure in the poor countryside and 350 billion ($51 billion) for environmental projects, according to Zhang.

It also includes 280 billion yuan ($41 billion) for construction of low-income housing and 40 billion yuan ($5.8 billion) for health and education programs, Zhang said.

Zhang said the government is working on how local governments will pay for their share of the stimulus spending. The central government is to supply 1.2 trillion yuan ($175 billion) of the total stimulus spending, with the rest coming from lower-level governments and state companies.

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

Coping with joblessness: A personal account

Gilbert Goh

I COUNT myself lucky to have survived two tough years of unemployment with mounting financial problems during the period after 9/11 right up to the Sars epidemic. My family had just returned from overseas as we were away for a year on study purposes. The situation was made worse when we decided to buy a private house burdened with a mortgage loan.

Although my wife works, it was tough to make ends meet with only one income. We also had a young daughter to raise. I faced sleepless nights trying to meet the minimum income payments for all my credit facilities (one credit card and one other credit facility) especially when the bank account dried up. There was an unforgettable day when my ATM bank account showed a balance of less than $20. The worst moments of my life came when I had to borrow cash from friends to tide over. This is when you realise who your true friends are and whether they will stand by you when you are almost down and out. To this day, I am thankful to many who helped me financially in a willing manner.

During that period, I hovered between desperation and panic. Naturally, relations with my wife was not the best.

After about six months of unemployment, I realised the first step was to manage my emotional health above all else. I realised that, if I could manage my emotions better and stay positive, I had a better chance of coming out of my financial crisis stronger. I also drew up a timetable so my days could pass by fruitfully. When one does not work, one has much free time to idle and often negativity floods our minds. I hope to share some personal experiences and strategies and, if possible, help some who are depressed and affected by the current financial crisis. I dare not say these strategies are surefire solutions but at least they can provide hope to the depressed and fuel optimism in those who are unemployed. For readers who are still employed and unaffected, it is a good time to prepare for retrenchment as it will come like a thief without any warning. When unemployment hits, we may be too shocked to face up to it.

- Share your tensions and frustrations with your family. Our loved ones are the closest to us and they yearn to share in our happy and sad moments. By cutting them out of our darkest moments, we deny them a chance to support and help us. Though my wife did not speak to me much during that tough period, her unwavering support and toughness to hang in there with me helped me to tide through that difficult period.

- Seek help if things are too overwhelming. I was fortunate to have many good friends and a good support group in a church that met weekly. They gave me the platform to raise my needs and shared my frustrations. It was a relief for me to know that people cared how I felt. It would be disastrous to face unemployment alone. So learn to share and be humble.

- Network more than ever. Many jobseekers stayed at home due more to depression than anything else. Like many, I sent e-mail messages to prospective employers and attended countless interviews, to no avail. Much later, I managed to secure a part-time job through a meeting with a long-lost friend. Although it paid only $6.50 an hour, finally I was relieved to know there was income coming in after 20 months of unemployment. More important, my self-esteem was boosted by the part-time work. That experience helped me land a full-time job six months later. To this day, I am eternally grateful to the friend who recommended me. My life turned around after that. So don’t stay at home - go out and move around. Opportunities are out there, but if we stay at home we cannot seize them.

- Think positive. This is easier said than done, but very important for one to stay on top of the situation. I read a lot of motivation books during that period, so my mind was full of positive thoughts. This was often done immediately after I woke and right before I slept. This helped me start and end the day with the right frame of mind. If not, our mind is always filled with negative and depressing thoughts.

- Indulge in physical activities. I turned to jogging daily more to occupy my ample free time than anything else. However, I discovered after every run I felt light hearted and positive about my situation. My mind was also free when I jogged and it was very therapautic. I later realised that, when one exercises, feel-good chemicals called endorphins are released and this help one stay calm and relaxed. I still run regularly and have taken part in the annual Standard Chartered Marathon.

- Spend time with your loved ones. I began to spend a lot of time with my mother and daughter, who stay at home. This not only took a lot of the free time I had but also allowed to indulge in meaningful activity. I must say my mother remained the most influential person during that dark period, allowing me to recover fully.

- Face the situation bravely. I learnt to face relatives and friends when I met them. It was sometimes difficult as I had difficulty explaining why I was still unemployed after so many months. It could even be depressing if questions were raised insensitively. So I prepared my answers before I met relatives and friends in social gatherings so I would not be caught unprepared. I also realised that such meetings can be used for networking purposes.

I hope this will help many who may be laid off in the coming months. Remember the world will not end and you are not alone. The dark moments will pass you by but the important thing is to hang in there and face up to challenges. What does not kill you will make you stronger. You will end up stronger mentally than before when you are baptised in the fiery fire of unemployment.

Property market to soften

PROPERTY prices are set to soften and demand will weaken as the Singapore economy slows down, Minister for National Development Mah Bow Tan said on Wednesday evening.

Private housing prices have declined by 2.4 per cent in the third quarter of this year, and further price movements will 'depend on the severity of the economic slowdown', he added.

Speaking at the 49th anniversary dinner of the Real Estate Developers' Association of Singapore (REDAS) at the Shangri-La Hotel, Mr Mah said: 'Going forward, price movements will depend on the...ability of the industry to make adjustments in response to the changes in economic conditions.'

The good news is that home-ownership rate is high in Singapore - at more than 90 per cent - and the government has an important role in ensuring the long-term stability and smooth functioning of the property market, he said.

Among the measures it should take, he said, is to guard against 'irrational market behaviour such as excessive speculation that is not in sync with economic fundamentals.'

But there are limits to what the government can do.

The government cannot, for example, dictate to banks that they should extend loans to companies or individuals with weak financial standing.

It also cannot work against market forces and try to prop up property prices artificially.

Mr Mah explained: 'Such efforts are not sustainable and will not be beneficial to the health of the property market in the long-run. Any measure seen to be knee-jerk or excessive might even weigh market sentiment down further.

'It is in our interest to ensure that the property prices move in line with economic fundamentals, as it affects home ownership, asset values, retirement savings and other sectors of the economy.'

What Would Warren Do?

Or better yet - what is the Oracle up to in this market, and can you do the same?

Warren Buffett has already told the world what he's doing in this frightful market. The Oracle of Omaha proudly proclaimed that he's "been buying American stocks" with his personal funds.

But it should also be noted that Buffett has been putting his investors' money on the line as well. After sitting on piles of cash for several years and lamenting the lack of attractive opportunities, Buffett has made several key acquisitions through his investment conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, culminating in a flurry of late- September and early-October deals.

In just a two-week span, Buffett picked up Constellation Energy for the relative bargain price of $4.7 billion. He bought $5 billion in preferred stock from Goldman Sachs, receiving a fat 10% yield. And he purchased $3 billion in preferred shares of GE, also yielding 10%.

This doesn't mean Buffett is saying go out and buy Goldman or GE (GE) stock. In fact, there are plenty of reasons why you shouldn't try to follow his lead, not the least of which is the fact that Berkshire gets deals that individuals simply can't.

But that's not the point. The opportunity here is to pick up some valuable investing wisdom from the greatest practitioner alive. In this spirit, here's what I think you can learn from Buffett's moves:

Be Greedy When Others Are Fearful

It's the most famous of all Buffett-isms: "Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful." Today there's ample evidence that people are scared, as fund investors have been redeeming record amounts of money from their stock portfolios.

By contrast, Buffett is putting his money to work. Berkshire's cash balance, by my estimate, is at its lowest level in recent memory.

Now, this doesn't mean the market will turn around tomorrow. But Buffett's point is that this is not the time to flee U.S. stocks. In fact, now is a great time to be looking for shares of high-quality firms that have been beaten down to affordable levels.

For examples of attractively priced industry leaders, see the suggestions to the right.

Don't Be Hobbled by Past Mistakes

Buffett's investment in Goldman Sachs (GS) was surprising to many, given his frequent digs at Wall Street's casino culture and a problematic investment he made in Salomon Brothers.

In 1987, Buffett bought a stake in Salomon to ward off a hostile takeover, but the firm nearly collapsed amid a bond bid-rigging scandal a few years later, and Buffett had to step in as interim chairman.

Although the investment eventually worked out - Salomon was bought by Travelers, which merged with Citicorp to form Citigroup (C) - it's safe to say that it was a longer and harder road than he had anticipated.

Still, Buffett understood that investment banking, for all its recent woes, is an attractive business if managed properly. The group of top-tier firms is fairly small, and it would be hard for a new competitor to break into the business, which gives Goldman Sachs tremendous bargaining power over its customers.

There's an important lesson in this for individual investors. Just because many financial stocks in your portfolio have imploded recently, it doesn't mean you should sell out of this sector entirely - or turn your back on these stocks for good.

Don't Fall in Love With Your Stocks

Buffett is famous for having said that his favorite holding period is "forever." But he will sell a stock he loves if conditions warrant. For example, late last year, as crude-oil prices were approaching $100 a barrel, Buffett jettisoned his stake in PetroChina (PTR).

Why? After multiplying more than fivefold since he bought it a few years earlier, PetroChina shares had reached fair value, so he sold. Since he cashed out, PetroChina shares have been cut in half.

Chalk this up to a lesson the Oracle learned in the late '90s. As he admitted in 2003, "...I made a big mistake in not selling several of our larger holdings during the Great Bubble."

Buffett similarly made what may be one of his best decisions when he sold Berkshire Hathaway's long-held stake in Freddie Mac (FRE) in 2000. He's never written about exactly why, but he noted presciently at his 2001 annual shareholder meeting that Freddie Mac's "risk profile had changed."

Keep Your Powder Dry

While the rest of the world gorged on cheap credit, Buffett maintained Berkshire's conservative profile. This hindered his returns when times were good, but having lots of cash on hand enabled Buffett to snap up once-in-a-lifetime deals, like Constellation Energy (CEG).

Buffett, who owns several utilities, jumped on Constellation in September after its shares tumbled from around $60 to his purchase price of $26.50 in a mere matter of days. The result: He nabbed a company that produces nearly $1 billion in earnings a year for less than $5 billion.

Now, you may not be in a position to keep $40 billion in the bank. But as Buffett showed, it's smart to have some cash on hand for opportunistic purchases. What's more, there's nothing wrong with being disciplined enough to turn your back on stocks that you're not 100% confident in. That's sage advice.

Why He's Warren Buffett — and You're Not

If investing were as simple as mimicking Warren Buffett, then all you'd have to do to retire rich would be to download a free copy of the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder letter and shadow the Oracle's moves.

Given that you're reading this article instead of relaxing at your seaside villa, it's clear copying Buffett is no easy task. So as you marvel at the Sage, keep the following in mind:

Warren Can Strike Deals You Can't

Buffett's reputation and Berkshire's financial heft are enormous advantages that regular investors simply don't share. Take his recent investment in Goldman Sachs (GS). It was made in preferred stock that was offered only to Berkshire and pays a 10% fixed yield.

That's twice what Uncle Sam is initially earning on the preferred shares it got from Goldman in exchange for injecting capital into the bank. But chalk that up to the Buffett premium. Firms want the Oracle to invest in them for his seal of approval.

Berkshire's purchase of Constellation Energy offers a great example. Constellation's shares had fallen 75% from their highs because the market was worried about the financial health of the company's energy-trading operations.

If you or I bought the stock at that level, we would have been making a bet that Constellation would pull through. But we would not have been able to affect the odds. However, Berkshire's financial strength and Buffett's name assured Constellation's survival, making the investment more valuable as soon as Warren bought the company.

Warren Is Smarter Than You Are

Many casual observers assume that Buffett simply buys great companies and hangs on to them. Simple, right? But the real key to Buffett's success is far more complicated.

Buffett has created enormous value for Berkshire by buying all kinds of securities, from common stock and preferred shares to currencies, distressed debt and options.

He has also made money through merger arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. These are all areas that only the most sophisticated investor should dabble in.

Why Mimic Warren When You Can Hire Him?

Your best bet for benefiting from Buffett's wisdom is the most obvious: Buy Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) stock.

It's really an investment company. But unlike a fund, it doesn't charge annual management fees. Buffett has deployed a lot of cash into attractive deals lately, which should add value for years to come.

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

'Worst still to come'

WASHINGTON - PRESIDENT-ELECT Barack Obama named his economic brain-trust, as he acknowledged millions more American workers could lose their jobs next year and played down expectations his administration could engineer a quick turnaround of the financial crisis.

Hoping to hit the ground running when he takes office Jan 20, the next president urged the new Congress on Monday to pass quickly what was expected to be a massive economic stimulus package, pledged help for the troubled US auto industry and blessed the Bush administration's moves to bail out the financial industry.

At the same time, Mr Obama said he planned a second news conference in as many days on Tuesday to discuss the need 'to scour our federal budget, line-by-line, and make meaningful cuts and sacrifices as well.' Mr Obama named New York Federal Reserve President Tim Geithner the next treasury secretary at a Monday press conference, where he said the United States faces a 'crisis of historic proportions' and played down expectations his administration could put the brakes on quickly.

'This will not be easy. There are no shortcuts or quick fixes to this crisis, which has been many years in the making, and the economy is likely to get worse before it gets better,' he said.

'Full recovery will not happen immediately.' 'Most experts now believe that we could lose millions of jobs next year,' he said.

Mr Obama ordered his team over the weekend to work on a programme to create or save 2.5 million jobs by the end of 2010. He would not put a figure on how large a stimulus package he wants from Congress, saying only that it would be 'costly,' but Democratic lawmakers speculated the price tag could reach US$700 billion (S$1.06 trillion) over two years.

At his Monday news conference, Mr Obama was critical of the country's top three automakers, saying he was surprised they did not have a precise plan for their future before asking Congress last week to approve US$25 billion in emergency loans. But, he said, once he sees a plan, he expected 'to be able to shape a rescue.'

Mr Obama also named Lawrence Summers as director of his National Economic Council. Summers was treasury secretary under former President Bill Clinton and is a former president of Harvard University.

He also intends to name Peter Orszag as his budget director, Democratic officials said on Monday, turning to Congress' chief adviser on spending and taxes as he fills out his economic team. Mr Orszag, 39, is serving a four-year term as head of the Congressional Budget Office. Mr Obama was set to make the announcement at his Tuesday news conference.

Mr Obama said the economic and financial crisis confronting the United States and the world demanded the 'sound judgment and fresh thinking' his new team would bring to bear on problems as great as any since the Great Depression in the 1930s.

The president-elect expressed confidence the nation would pull out of the economic morass 'because we've done it before.' Mr Geithner and Mr Summers are seen as reassuring economic and political voices for the incoming Obama administration.

Senator Judd Gregg, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said the appointment of Mr Geithner and Mr Summers means the federal government is committed to ensuring 'the solvency and orderly functioning of the credit markets and key institutions that underwrite and energize businesses across the nation, from Wall Street to Main Street.'

Kicking off the Thanksgiving holiday week in the United States, Mr Obama also announced two other members of his new economic team. He named Christina Romer as chairman of his Council of Economic Advisers, and Melody Barnes as director of his White House Domestic Policy Council.

Mr Geithner is an Asian affairs veteran who has studied Japanese and Chinese and has lived throughout the region. He earned an Asian studies degree from Dartmouth College and international economics and East Asian studies degrees from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, according to the Federal Reserve website.

The scope of the recovery package he plans would be far more ambitious than Mr Obama had spelled out during his presidential campaign, when he proposed US$175 billion to be used for in spending and tax-cutting stimulus. The new plan will be significantly larger and incorporate his campaign ideas for new jobs in environmentally friendly technologies. It also would include his proposals for tax relief for middle- and lower-income workers.

Significantly, the plan would not offer an immediate tax increase on wealthy taxpayers. During the campaign, Obama said he would raise taxes of people making more than US$250,000. On Monday he signaled his intention to go forward with the tax hike on wealthier earners but was less clear about when that might occur, suggesting it might wait until cuts implemented by President George W. Bush expire in 2011.

In the country's latest financial bailout, the US government said late Sunday it had agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses at the banking giant Citigroup and to put a fresh US$20 billion into the stricken company.

Mr Bush said he consulted with Mr Obama on the Citigroup rescue, noting 'close cooperation' between his administration and the incoming Obama camp. -- AP

IT sector to slump next year

By Serene Luo

TOUGH times are likely to force IT market growth worldwide next year down to a measly 2.3 per cent, revised downward from 5.8 per cent.

IT spending by companies will also be slow, even flat or negative, in developed economies, particularly in the United States and Western Europe, and in Asian countries like Singapore, South Korea and Japan too.

Yet, the Asia-Pacific markets are likely to be one of the least affected in this downturn, said technology market research firm Gartner, in a media briefing on Tuesday.

This is because 'emerging powerhouses' such as China and India, and growing markets like the Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia will drive growth, and thus IT spend on products and services.

Gartner's managing vice-president Matthew Boon, who is based in North Sydney, also pointed out that many companies are likely to cut or delay discretionary IT spend, but preserve essential expenditures.

He, however, warned that companies should look at the long term in order to support growth once economies begin to recover.

OECD warns of worst recession since early 1980s

By Pan Pylas, AP Business Writer
OECD says developed world could face worst recession since early 1980s; warns of deflation

LONDON (AP) -- The financial crisis will likely push the world's developed countries into their worst recession since the early 1980s, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said Tuesday.

In its half-yearly economic outlook, the Paris-based organization said economic output will likely shrink by 0.4 percent in 2009 for the 30 market democracies that make up its membership, against the 1.4 percent growth prediction for 2008. As a result, the OECD said it supported fiscal rescue measures, including tax cuts, provided they were targeted and temporary.

The OECD said the number of unemployed across its members could rise by 8 million over the next two years and that there is a risk, "albeit small," that some countries will experience deflation -- falling prices.

The OECD said the U.S. was likely to contract by 0.9 percent in 2009 following a 1.4 percent expansion this year. Japanese output is only expected to contract by 0.1 percent in 2009 following 0.5 percent growth this year, while the 15-nation euro-zone will likely shrink by 0.6 percent next year after 1.0 percent growth this.

The OECD's latest 2009 projections for the world's leading three economic areas are more or less the same as the preliminary forecasts made earlier this month ahead of the G-20 meeting of world leaders in Washington, with only 2009 growth in the euro-zone revised down from the previous estimate of -0.5 percent.

The OECD said economic growth of its membership fell by an annualized quarter-on-quarter 0.2 percent in the third quarter this year and will keep contracting until the middle of 2009. The biggest loss of output in the OECD is expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2008, with a 1.4 percent contraction predicted.

The figures indicate that the developed world has now entered a slump estimated to last at least four quarters; two consecutive quarters is a common definition of recession.

"Many OECD economies are in, or are on the verge of, a protracted recession of a magnitude not experienced since the early 1980s," said Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, the OECD's chief economist

The OECD said the U.S. economy would contract by an annualized rate of 0.3 percent in the third quarter, followed by a massive 2.8 percent decline in the last quarter. Recovery is only anticipated in the third quarter of 2009 when output is set to spike 0.6 percent as the effects of the credit squeeze abate, the housing downturn bottoms out and low interest rates bear fruit.

In the euro-zone, output is seen to have fallen by 0.9 percent in the third quarter, followed by a 1.0 percent decline in the fourth. As in the U.S, output is not expected to rebound until the third quarter of 2009, and only then by the modest amount of 0.1 percent. Official European Union figures earlier this month confirmed that the euro-zone as a whole is in recession.

In Japan, the recession, which started in the second quarter of 2008, is only expected to last through to the first quarter of 2009, when output is expected to rebound by an annual rate of 0.8 percent. However, output is set to stagnate over the second half of 2009 as the global economic downturn and the recent rise in the yen hits demand for Japanese goods.

Because of the anticipated bounce-back in growth by the second half of next year, the OECD projected that economic output across its membership will rise in 2010 by 1.5 percent.

The OECD's Schmidt-Hebbel said "prompt and massive" policy action to restore confidence and provide liquidity in the banking sector appears to have "successfully limited the period of panic" but that financial institutions still need to repair their balance sheets.

"This process of adjustment will take some time and impair the flow of credit, and is the key factor weighing on activity going forward," he said.

The uncertainties around the projections are "exceptionally large", mainly on the downside and mostly relate to the assumption regarding the speed at which the financial market crisis is overcome, said Schmidt-Hebbel.

"Specifically, we assume that the extreme financial stress since mid-September will be short-lived but will be followed by an extended period of financial headwinds through late 2009, with a gradual normalization thereafter," he said.

The OECD added that there was a justification for governments around the world to cut taxes or raise spending to ameliorate the effects of the recession.

"Against the backdrop of a deep economic downturn, fiscal policy stimulus has an important role to play," Schmidt-Hebbel said.

"It is vital that any discretionary action by timely and temporary," he said.

The OECD highlighted a number of countries where the downturn will be severe, partly because of falling house prices. These include Britain, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Spain and Turkey.

"These economies are most directly affected by the financial crisis, which in some cases has exposed other vulnerabilities, or by severe housing downturns," said Schmidt-Hebbel.

The OECD said Britain will see output decline by 1.1 percent in 2009 after growing by only 0.8 percent in 2008. The forecasts are similar to those announced Monday by the British government following its 20 billion pound ($30 billion) stimulus package.

Elsewhere, the OECD said economic growth in China will remain below the double-figure rates experienced over the last few years through to the end of the decade. For 2009, the OECD projected Chinese growth to moderate to 8.0 percent.

Civil service to cut pay

AMID a darkening economic outlook, cabinet ministers and senior civil servants would see their pay packets next year shrink by up to 19 per cent- with the President and the Prime Minister taking the biggest hit.

This is even as a planned salary increase is deferred.

Meanwhile, all civil servants across the board would get one month less bonus this year, as compared to last year.

In a statement yesterday, the Public Service Division (PSD), which oversees civil service matters, pointed to the slowdown in the global economy and in Singapore as the reason for these moves.

The top government officials - political leaders, administrative officers (AOs), judicial and statutory appointees - will feel the pain on two fronts:

First, a cut in their GDP Bonus, which is linked to Singapore's gross domestic product growth. This comprises a 'significant portion' - close to 25 per cent - of their annual salaries.

'With a weak economy, these components will automatically fall,' said the PSD.

This means a fall in total pay packets of 11 per cent to 19 per cent. The more senior the officials, the deeper the cut.

At the top, there will be a 19 per cent fall in the annual salaries of President S R Nathan (to $3.14 million) and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (to $3.04 million).

Senior permanent secretaries and entry-grade ministers at the MR4 grade would take a 18 per cent cut (to $1.57 million).

AOs at the entry superscale grade of SR9 - these are usually top-performing AOs in their early or mid 30s, and directors in ministries - would see their packets drop 12 per cent (to $353,000).

Also not spared are the Members of Parliament, whose allowance would fall by 16 per cent (to $190,000).

Second, a planned move to adjust upwards the salaries of the ministers and permanent secretaries at the MR4 grade has been postponed.

In April last year, the Government had announced that it intended to adjust their annual salaries from 77 per cent to 88 per cent of the private-sector benchmark by the end of this year.

This is now deferred.

Instead, their pay packets are now at 56 per cent of the benchmark, which is set at two-thirds of the median pay of the top eight earners in each of six sectors such as banking and engineering.

On when the adjustment would eventually take place, the PSD told The Straits Times: 'When the economy recovers and private-sector salaries increase, civil service salaries will have to move up too in order to remain competitive with the private sector.'

Monday, 24 November 2008

5 Ways to Kick Bad Money Habits

Our parents, peers, the Joneses, and others have a lot of sway over our financial decisions -- both good and bad. All these outside influences can make it hard to heed that little voice inside our head -- the reasonable one, that is, telling us to shape up or declare bankruptcy and not go back to the fridge for a third helping of Chunky Monkey.

To kick bad money habits (or boost good ones), you've got to change the way you think about change, according to the authors of "The True Cost of Happiness." Change is not a punishment for failure; it's the process of getting you closer to what you really want.

So what exactly is it that you really want? Here's a five-step plan to help you figure it out and actually institute the changes that you most want to make in your financial life:

1. Identify your real goals.
Don't skip right to the numbers. Start with the "Financial Self-Reflection" worksheet from Fool.com's "How to Set Up a Spending Plan." Awareness isn't an automatic fix, but it helps you address your challenges.

2. Explore your behavioral influences.
Reflect on the familial, social, and personal powers at play in your financial choices. Write down things that trigger unwanted actions and tap into those that serve you well instead. (For help delving into those subconscious influences, see "Money Woes? Blame Your Mother.")

3. Adjust the numbers and make goals concrete.
After you have a clearer picture of your current spending (use the "Where Does My Dough Go?" worksheet, also found under the "Set Up a Spending Plan" Money Goal), make a concrete plan using the "Set Spending Priorities" worksheet to redirect your money to best reflect your real desires.

4. Use visual cues to remind yourself of your goals.
Keep the bad influences in check -- track your progress (post it on the fridge!) or carry a picture of your dream home in your wallet.

5. Remind yourself that change is gradual.
Money mindfulness isn't instantaneous. It takes continual work to alter a lifelong way of thinking. Use setbacks as tools to identify areas in which you're still vulnerable.

5 Things to Freak Out About

Our fellow Americans are experiencing a world of hurt -- layoffs, postponed retirements, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and, at best, angst and uncertainty. Your empathy is appreciated, but is that really the best use of your energy right now?

No it's not. Not that you need anyone's permission, but here it is: It's time to be self-centered -- to be selfish and absorbed with your own financial situation. Freaking out about things that are out of your control won't magically make the stock market bounce back and unemployment reverse itself.

If you want to freak out about something, freak out about your issues -- in particular, the things over which you do have some measure of control. Here are five:

1. Corral your cash flow: You know deep inside (or maybe not so deep) what you need and what you simply want -- in other words, stuff you don't need. It's time to prioritize -- formally, as in on paper tacked onto the fridge. Schedule a quarterly financial review -- here's an agenda you can use.

2. Make sure your short-term money is safe: It's never heartening to see a bank go belly up. Still, don't ignore the built-in safety net that your bank offers, namely FDIC insurance. First, check to make sure your deposits are indeed insured by the FDIC. The aptly titled "The New Rules of Safe Banking" will show you how. If your balances exceed coverage limits ($250,000 for most deposit accounts and $250,000 for qualified retirement accounts), move the excesses into another FDIC-insured institution, and not just a different branch of the same bank.

3. Remove some risk from your portfolio: If you neglected to review your portfolio before Wall Street imploded, it's still not too late. Take a look at how your assets are allocated. The idea is to hold a mix of asset classes that don't always move in the same direction. Are you properly diversified? Is your portfolio too stock-heavy for your time horizon? A portfolio spread out among, for example, small U.S. stocks, large international stocks, bonds, emerging markets and cash offers a much smoother ride. A bad run for one asset class can be offset by another that's having a bang-up year (or at least one that's not tragic).

4. Keep calm, think long: It may be hard to look at your investments and not have an emotional reaction. Try anyway. Investing decisions based on emotional reactions rarely ever work out well. Over the long term -- "long term" is key here, folks -- the stock market rewards plain old level-headedness. Markets like the one we're in now really test our risk tolerances. Maybe you thought you could handle volatility -- so how does it feel in practice?

Arlington, Va.-based financial life planner Lisa Kirchenbauer put this situation in perspective for her clients by posing a relatively simple question:

Will you be more upset if you stay in the market and it continues to go down for an extended time (i.e. months, not days or weeks)? Or will you be more upset if you were to get out of your stock investments now, only to watch the stock market rally and you miss the recovery?

As you can guess, there is no single right answer -- just the right answer for each individual. We presented five of our ideas in a special report: "What Investors Should Be Doing Right Now."

5. Do something. Or not: Depending on your response to the question above, you may need to make some adjustments to your investment approach. So hop to it! If you're feeling queasy about adding more money to stocks right now, funnel that savings into your emergency fund. If missing a recovery would upset you more, then this may be a great time to buy, or at least stay put for a while (so long as you are adequately diversified).

The point is that these are decisions you can control. It's your money, and there are many ways in which you call the shots. Yup, that's right -- in the end, it really is all about you.

News of job cuts almost everyday...

Please try to recall the situation now when the next crisis hits again...and never make the same mistake during the next crisis...

This blog serves to keep a memory of the 2008/2009 financial crisis so that we will not forget the pain and get complacent again during the next crisis....

Citigroup is on its knees

NEW YORK - LESS than two months ago, Citigroup emerged from the wreckage of the financial crisis as one of the last titans left standing on Wall Street.

Now, in a stunning turnabout, the banking giant has fallen to its knees after a crisis in confidence erased half its stock-market value in three days - and left it running short on time and options.

The bank has started talks with the United States government, which may step in with a rescue bid. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke may favour a rescue to avoid the aftermath of Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy in September.

Citigroup's US$2 trillion (S$3 trillion) worth of assets dwarfs companies such as American International Group that got support from the US government this year.

'Citi is in the category of 'too big to fail',' said Mr Michael Holland, chairman and founder of Holland & Co, which oversees US$4 billion. 'There is a commitment from this administration and the next to do what it takes to save Citi.'

While Citigroup executives say the company has adequate capital and liquidity to ride out the crisis, its tumbling share price may shake confidence. A similar scenario had played out at Lehman, when chief executive officer Richard Fuld declared the firm was 'on the right track' five days before the firm went bankrupt.

'The market may be implying some sort of regulatory intervention,' said former Lehman analyst Jason Goldberg.

Citigroup, which was born from the merger of Citicorp and Travelers Group, has been seeing a steady decline in its share price. This snowballed last week as speculation grew that the bank may require a government bailout, a forced merger or an ouster of the company's embattled chief executive Vikram Pandit.

In the last five days alone, more than half its market value was vaporised, with calls intensifying for it to find ways to lift its stock price, including splitting the firm, selling pieces, or selling itself outright. The bank has fought back vigorously saying its capital position is strong. Last Monday, it announced plans to cut costs and slash 52,000 jobs.

The speculation swirling round Citigroup comes as shares on Wall Street soared late Friday after reports that President-elect Barack Obama would name New York Federal Reserve president Timothy F. Geithner as his treasury secretary.

Still, Friday's gains were not enough to wipe away the losses of the last two days, which brought Wall Street to its lowest levels since 1997. The Dow ended the week down 5 per cent, and the S&P 500 was 8 per cent lower.

New York Times, Bloomberg

Tough economic times ahead

PARIS - INVESTORS braced on Sunday for another topsy-turvy week on trading floors as leading economies prepared new plans to emerge from a financial crisis that world leaders warned would take time to overcome.

US president-elect Barack Obama was expected to unveil his economic braintrust on Monday after announcing a plan to create 2.5 million jobs by 2011, while the British government pledged swift tax relief to households, with both countries staring at recession.

Meanwhile, leaders of 21 Asia-Pacific economies making up around half of world trade vowed during a summit in Lima to resist protectionism, saying it would only worsen the troubled global economy.

Mr Obama, who takes office on January 20, was reportedly expected to present on Monday New York central banker Timothy Geithner, 47, as his Treasury secretary to oversee the country's US$700 billion (S$1.07 billion) bailout package.

The Democrat on Saturday outlined in broad strokes his plan for a broad stimulus package to lift Americans out of economic peril fuelled by sweeping housing foreclosures and job losses.

'We'll be working out the details in the weeks ahead, but it will be a two-year, nationwide effort to jumpstart job creation in America and lay the foundation for a strong and growing economy,' Mr Obama said.

Wall Street staged a strong rally Friday as traders cheered reports that Geithner would become Treasury chief.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq hit their lowest levels in over five years last week and the broad-market Standard & Poor's 500 fell to its weakest since 1997.

Investors will be looking this week for new indications about the health of the US economy as they pore over a barrage of data including figures on existing and new US home sales and consumer confidence.

Across the Atlantic, British finance minister Alistair Darling will deliver on Monday his pre-budget report to parliament where he is expected to outline plans to slash taxes and boost spending.

'I shall set out measures designed to help people pay their bills, keep businesses afloat, and maintain spending on health and education,' Mr Darling wrote in the Sunday Mirror newspaper.

'Every household will get support now - to help them through the difficult period ahead,' he wrote.

'Like every other country in the world hit by major economic shocks we are in a difficult position. And we, like many advanced economies, are moving into a recession.'

World leaders warned that tough times lie ahead.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose cabinet has approved a 23-billion-euro (S$44 billion) stimulus package, warned in the Welt am Sonntag newspaper on Sunday that 2009 will be 'a year of bad news' for the economy.

But she said she hoped the stimulus plan, which has to be submitted to parliament, will protect jobs and put the economy 'back on its feet in 2010.' Germany has fallen into its first recession in five years.

Outgoing US President George W. Bush expressed a similar sentiment.

'As we look to the future, the tasks facing our nations are no doubt demanding,' he said from Lima where he attended the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) forum.

'Recovering from the financial crisis is going to take time, but we'll recover, and in so doing begin a new era of prosperity,' Mr Bush said Saturday.

Apec leaders warned against sealing trade borders in the face of financial turmoil.

'There is a risk that slower world growth could lead to calls for protectionist measures which would only exacerbate the current economic situation,' Apec leaders said in a joint statement.

While Apec leaders vowed a united front against the crisis, they appeared unlikely to unveil bold initiatives before the meeting adjourns on Sunday.

In Britain, Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for bold and proactive government policies to steer the world economy through the financial crisis and a subsequent sharp downturn.

'Doing nothing is not an option,' Brown said in a speech to be delivered Monday at the annual conference of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which is the country's biggest employers' organisation.

'A new approach is now needed if we are to get through this unprecedented global financial recession with the least damage to Britain's long-term economic prospects,' he said, according to an advance copy of his speech. -- AFP

Pay cut for civil service?

THE Public Service Division (PSD) will make an announcement soon about year-end bonuses and salaries for civil servants, Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said yesterday.
'The principles underpinning civil service pay as well as the pay of political leaders...are well known and you can just wait for the announcement before long on that,' he told reporters at a press conference held to announce measures to help businesses and workers.

A panel of ministers was asked if senior officers and leaders in the public sector would lead by example and take pay cuts in difficult times. 'We're not here to grandstand,' Mr Tharman said.

The response from labour chief Lim Swee Say, also a Minister in the Prime Minister's Office, suggested a wage cut might be in the offing: 'From the labour movement, I think we will not be surprised (if) the public sector sees a wage cut because with the GDP declining, that must factor into the flexible component of wages.'

A significant part of the annual pay for a senior civil servant or minister takes the form of a GDP Bonus, which is linked to growth in the gross domestic product. The bonus is paid in March each year, with the amount linked to GDP growth in the preceding year. Started in 2000, it was revised last year to form 20 per cent of the annual pay of top officials. It comes to three months if the economy grows by 5 per cent, and can go up to eight months if growth hits 10 per cent or more. It is not paid if growth is 2 per cent or less.

The civil service is also expected to make a related announcement on the third phase of previously disclosed salary adjustments for top civil servants and ministers. This concerns raising pay packages from the current 77 per cent of a salary benchmark to 88 per cent. The benchmark is set at two-thirds of the median pay of the top eight earners in each of six sectors.

Mr Lim said yesterday the labour movement has long advocated the adoption of a flexible wage system. Under the system, senior management would take more of its pay in the form of a variable component than lower-ranking staff would. Over the years, more organisations have heeded the call to switch over, he said.

'In the private sector, we expect to see many in senior management take a bigger cut in total wages than rank-and-file workers. In the public sector, likewise, I think flexibility has been enhanced over the years.'

Sunday, 23 November 2008

FOOLED by new client's posh appearance

Broker to pay $350,000 in stock market loss after client, who drove Jaguar and lived in condo, vanishes

By Tay Shi'an
November 23, 2008 / Source : The Electric New Paper



THEY are sometimes referred to as brokers. For one remisier, however, the word has taken an awfully literal meaning.

Reason: She may soon go broke having to make up for a rogue client's losses.

The client, a Malaysian woman in her 60s, had seemed financially reliable. She lived in private property. Her family gets around in a Jaguar. And she had put a US$50,000 ($76,600) deposit to begin trading.

The remisier, who has been in the industry for more than five years, said: 'I thought this client was able to trade and able to pay.'

But then the client lost US$227,000 after taking huge risks on the US stock market, betting on shares such as AIG and Fannie Mae.And she vanished.

Now, the remisier, who is in her 30s, will have to settle the debt with her brokerage firm if the client cannot be found.

That's because, under the remisier's agreement with her firm, if any of her clients do not honour their debts, it is the remisier who will have to pay the firm.

This is the standard practice in the industry, firms and remisiers told The New Paper when asked.

Ms Lim (not her real name) has since filed a police report and magistrate's complaint against the client.

She asked not to be named, as her colleagues do not know about her loss.

She said the walk-in client opened the trading account in April. In her application, the client stated that she had an annual income of between $100,000 and $200,000, and a net worth of $250,000 to $500,000, excluding properties and retirement assets.

She also stated that she was the director of a Malaysian company, and lived in private property in Singapore.

As she wanted to play the US stock market, she was asked to place a US$50,000 cash deposit with the brokerage firm. This amount varies on the discretion of the remisier.

Ms Lim said she did not do a check to verify the personal information provided by the client, and did not know if the firm did its checks.

The remisier said the Internet trading account was used by the client and the client's son, who appeared to be in his 40s.

For five months, the account was very active and volatile because of the wild swings in the US stock market.

The client and her son would frequently do contra-trading, meaning they would buy shares without coming up with any capital, hoping to sell them for a higher price within the three-day settlement period.

Suspended account

They would then pocket any profits, or fork out the difference in losses to the brokerage firm.

Ms Lim said she suspended the account about five times, when the losses reached the deposit sum of US$50,000. But she reinstated them each time, after mother and son made good the losses.

Ms Lim said she met the son and his girlfriend once, when they drove up in a Jaguar to hand a cheque to her. She claimed the son rebuked her for suspending the account and was 'abusive'.

By September, the account had a profit of US$180,000.

But things went horribly wrong within the same month when the client and her son traded heavily on shares such as AIG, Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers and Washington Mutual.

The share prices plummeted. Within a week, the account chalked up US$227,000 in contra losses.

Ms Lim said: 'They did Internet trading, so it was very hard to control. By the time I woke up, (the trades) were done.'

Ms Lim immediately suspended the account and contacted mother and son to settle the debt.

But in an SMS reply dated 29 Sep, the son wrote, 'want me honour my lost and yet u suspend my line..its nt profesional..talk to yr boss' (sic).

After several days of unreturned phone calls, Ms Lim made house visits alone on two occasions to the family's condo home in the west. Both times, she saw only two children in the house.

She got another SMS message from the son on 1 Oct, telling her not to 'disturb' his mother, but the next day, the son sent her a message promising to settle the debt a week after.

When she did not hear from him by then, Ms Lim made another house visit, this time with a debt collector - only to find the condo unit empty.

That was when she found out they were tenants who had lived there for only a few months.

Ms Lim lodged a police report on 12 Oct.

Her last contact with the family was an SMS message from the client on 13 Oct: 'U dun keep chasing. Give some time. Wil sort out.' The telephone numbers were disconnected soon after.

Ms Lim reported the client's account as delinquent to the Singapore Exchange on 21 Oct.

That was when she found out that another major brokerage firm had also blacklisted the same client on 10 Oct for failure to pay. It is understood that the sum owed to the other firm is about $5,000.

Ms Lim said that even if she hired a debt collector now, she would not be able to tell them where to look for the client.

She consulted a private investigator, but was reluctant to pay several thousand dollars to track down mother and son.

'It'll be throwing good money after bad money,' she said.

When speaking to The New Paper, Ms Lim appeared stoic about her loss, which she wryly compared to the cost of a Housing Board flat.

Ms Lim said she has told her family about the loss: 'My parents are very worried, but still very supportive.

'I just wish I let go of the account and passed it to someone else. Now, I've got to bear the debt.'

Ms Lim is still trying ways and means to track down the missing client, but she is also preparing for the worst.

She declined to reveal how she would repay the debt to her brokerage firm. 'I'll just have to come up with the money somehow,' she said.

Hope for investors in East?

HONG KONG - THERE could have been no worse time to hold an expo on the Asian property market this year than November.

As the impact of the global financial crisis on the region unravels - in the form a slumping stock market, company bankruptcies, steep falls in flat prices, and job cuts - even the most daring of property investors have taken a step back.

It was against this backdrop that the Asian version of an international real estate summit held annually in Cannes, France, was held last week in Hong Kong.

The number of exhibitors at the MIPIM Asia conference - developers, banks, fund managers, architectural firms, hotel groups and construction companies, mostly from Asia - dropped to 190 from last year's 236, organisers said.

Visitors were also down to 1,700 from more than 2,100 last year.

During the three days, November 19-21, there were times when the number of people manning the exhibition booths outnumbered visitors.

Despite the lukewarm attendance, however, those who did make it to the expo shared the same enthusiasm for answering the question: Is the Asia market the last bastion of hope for property investment?

'More than ever, we do need this kind of event, our trade delegates really need to communicate in this hard moment,' Mr Gilles Chaumet, MIPIM Asia director, said.

As the domestic property markets in the US and Europe are being battered by the credit crunch, many investment groups are starting to preach to their clients about the wisdom of shifting their capital to Asian properties.

'What we will probably see at some stage in early 2009 is that investment committees and fund managers will sit down to look at their asset allocations and say we want to have a certain amount in emerging markets,' Mr Glenn Maguire, chief Asia economist at Societe Generale in Hong Kong and keynote speaker at the expo, said.

'I think you will see a reweighting of asset allocation within the emerging market space which is more favourable to Asia, and less favourable to Latin America and Eastern Europe,' he said.

Given that a lot of wealth created over the past decade from the equity market has proved to be worthless, Mr Maguire said, investors will find themselves increasingly attracted to the tangibility of properties.

While Eastern Europe and Latin America both have high exposure to the international banking system, Asia, which is leveraged off China, has generally kept its financial system intact with relatively low borrowing levels, he said.

The resilience of Asian economies under the sub-prime crisis appears to be supported by recent economic data.

An analysis by AME Capital showed that gains made by real estate funds with an Asian mandate dropped to 0.25 per cent in 2007 from 33 percent in 2006 - which compares favourably with European and US mandated funds, which posted respective losses of 25 and 20 per cent in 2007.

Within Asia, Mr Maguire said he expected economies which have for a long time exported to China, such as Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, to outperform those which have relied on US consumption, such as Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand.

Despite the downturn, funds targeting Asia have burgeoned in recent months, said Mr Andrew Weir, who looks after property and infrastructure at KPMG China.

Apart from continuing interest from the Middle East, he said, many sovereign funds had maintained high asset allocations to Asian properties 'behind the radar screen'.

'The other source of capital coming to the Asian market is what I call 'unlisted wealth' - high net-worth individuals in Asia who haven't been really affected by the stock market situation,' he said.

Mr Weir considered it a 'once-in-a-lifetime' opportunity for long-term investment into second-tier Chinese cities such as Chongqing and Wuhan as the central government had recently unveiled economic stimulus packages to boost infrastructure, speed up urbanisation and encourage domestic consumption.

'If you have the perspective that China's long-term demographics and urbanisation story is very solid, this is a historic opportunity to get sites in those cities,' he said.

'Quite a lot of people think that the next six months is the right time to enter into the market.' -- AFP

A Depression Coming? Not Likely

Expect to see a recession similar to those in the 1970s and early 1980s.

What are the odds that this economic slump will deepen into a genuine depression not seen since the 1930s? In my judgment, it's not likely. Instead, I foresee a moderately severe recession.

We're all hearing more and more comparisons being drawn to the Great Depression. Yes, we're in the worst financial crisis since that era, but by no means the worst economic crisis since then -- not comparable to, say, the mid-1970s.

Former Goldman Sachs chairman John C. Whitehead got a lot of attention last week with his statement that the federal government could face a downgrading of its credit rating, aggravating the recession. The result, he said, "would be worse than the Depression." Now, "would" is a squishy word in forecasting, but the headlines screamed, "Whitehead Sees Slump Worse Than Depression."

Whitehead, a distinguished American of 86 years, was an adolescent during the 1930s, so he should remember those horrible times well. I wasn't born until after World War II, so my knowledge of the Depression comes largely from books. Here are some things I've learned:

The Great Depression was a global economic collapse of unfathomable magnitude, and today's statistics of pain would have to be multiplied manyfold to match those of the 1930s.

And the Depression was preventable -- if governments worldwide had responded earlier and smarter after the stock market crash of 1929. The lessons learned since then greatly reduce the likelihood of a reprise of that decade of hardship.

Shrinking Production

America's national output plunged for four straight years, 1930-1933, with a total drop in dollar value of some 50%, because of a combination of lower volume and falling prices (deflation).

The massive federal spending of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal caused the gross domestic product (GDP) to rise from 1934 through 1937. Then the nation was shocked by a severe relapse (the "Roosevelt Recession") that saw national production fall in 1938. The Great Depression was finally ended not by the New Deal, but by rising U.S. industrial output in 1940-1941 to aid our allies in Europe, under assault by Adolf Hitler.

By comparison, in this recession we're likely to see several quarters of low-single-digit declines of GDP over the coming year. A 7% quarterly contraction, last seen in mid-1980, would be highly surprising in this slump, and most quarterly declines will probably be smaller, on the order of 2% to 4%.

Unemployment

In the first year after the stock market crash of 1929, unemployment tripled from 3% of the labor force to 9%, and then it kept on rising -- from 16% in 1931 to an appalling 24% in 1932. That's nearly one out of every four workers, in an era when most families were supported by one wage earner. The New Deal's public works programs cut joblessness dramatically, but it was still running at 14% in 1937 and soared again to 19% during the 1937-1938 relapse.

Today, by contrast, we're just north of 6% unemployment in households typically supported by two earners, which staves off severe hardship while the jobless worker looks for new employment. At Kiplinger, we expect the unemployment rate to peak at 8% to 9% over the coming year as layoffs continue in sectors ranging from construction and autos to finance and retailing.

Personal Savings

With no federal deposit insurance in the early 1930s, the failure of some 9,000 banks caused an estimated $140 billion in depositor losses. Many Americans saw their entire life savings wiped out. But today's bank failures measure in the hundreds, and not a dime of insured money has been lost. Even depositors who were over the FDIC limits have received some protection. For example, in the July 2008 failure of California's IndyMac Bank, half of depositors' uninsured funds have been returned to them and more may eventually be recovered.

However, a much higher percentage of Americans own stocks today -- either directly or in mutual funds, and in IRAs and 401(k)s -- than in the 1920s, so today's market declines, though much milder than in the Great Depression, affect many more Americans than back then.

Falling Stock Prices

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 89% from 1929 to 1932, and it didn't return to its pre-Depression high until the mid-1950s. Today the major indexes are down about 40% from their highs in the fall of 2007, and they are below their levels of a decade ago. So far, this latest bear market hasn't reached the 50% drop last seen in 2000-2002 and 1973-1975.

As I've noted before on this site, no one knows when a market bottom will be reached, but I believe stocks purchased now and in the coming months will see strong gains over the next few years as the global economy recovers.

Homes Lost

Homeownership was much lower at the beginning of the Depression than today, but homeowners' inability to refinance five-year balloon mortgages led to massive foreclosures.

Today an estimated 5% of U.S. homes are in foreclosure or at risk of being lost, a number that is likely to rise as layoffs mount. But home losses will be dampened by some sort of foreclosure prevention program envisioned by Congress. The 5% number is more than twice the level of a few years ago, but still a small share of all households.

Deflation Coming?

There is a mounting worry today about the threat of deflation -- a broad, sustained fall in consumer prices and wages. Falling prices cause consumers to postpone purchases in the hope of even lower prices later, which dampens the economy further.

Deflation last occurred in the early 1930s, because of a collapse of consumer purchasing power due to soaring unemployment, and it was aggravated by the Federal Reserve's foolish contraction of the money supply. In the three years after the market crash of 1929, the Fed apparently shrank the money supply by nearly one-third -- precisely the wrong medicine for a fearful and credit-starved economy.

Consumer prices fell for three straight years, 1930-1932, for a total drop of more than 10%. Over the following five years, because of the massive New Deal stimulus, the price level stabilized and then rose modestly, but there was a return to deflation during 1938-1939.

Today the risk of a long, sustained fall in wages and prices is much less. Yes, consumer and business spending will contract, but it won't collapse. The Federal Reserve is pulling out all the stops to get credit flowing better, and free spending by Washington will go a long way toward bolstering private sector demand.

Global Trade

Another governmental mistake that contributed to the Great Depression was shortsighted trade policy, such as the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930, which raised duties on imported goods and led foreign governments to do the same. From 1929 through 1933, U.S. exports fell by some 50% in volume and by nearly two-thirds in dollar value.

Today global trade is more important to the U.S. and world economies than it was 80 years ago, and governments will not repeat the mistake of excessive protectionism. My colleagues and I at The Kiplinger Letter expect U.S. export growth -- a star of our economy today -- to cool from the double-digit annual gains of recent years, but not collapse. There will continue to be strong demand for American goods and services from such high-growth economies as China, India and Brazil.

In the 1930s, there was an absence of international cooperation in fighting the crisis. Today there is both coordination among central banks and rapid emulation of creative solutions born in one country or another.

Government Stimulus

Herbert Hoover's administration -- contrary to today's mythology -- did attempt a lot of stimulus. It boosted infrastructure spending on roads and dams, created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to aid industry, banks and cities, and started unemployment benefits through the Emergency Relief Agency.

Roosevelt, as candidate for president in 1932, castigated Hoover for wild deficit spending and vowed to balance the federal budget. But in the five months between his election and inauguration day (in March back then), FDR did the most amazing about-face in political history.

His "brains trust" quickly decided that short-run stimulus was more important than budget deficits, and the New Deal embarked on a radical restructuring of the U.S. economy -- the efficacy of which is still being debated by economists generations later.

By the end of the 1930s, the accumulated U.S. national debt had multiplied from $17 billion to $43 billion, and it continued to soar through World War II.

In today's recession, Congress and the White House (both outgoing President George W. Bush and incoming President Barack Obama) seem inclined to spend whatever is necessary to forestall a deep, long recession -- budget deficits be damned. Next year, the deficit could hit $1 trillion dollars. At 7% of GDP, it would top the modern deficit record of 6% set in 1983, following the last severe U.S. recession. It would be well short of the 30% of GDP represented by the deficit in 1943, at the height of World War II.

Someday all of this borrowed money will have to paid off by inflation or higher taxes -- most likely by both.

Today's Safety Nets

Finally, it should be noted that America in the early 1930s was largely without the financial safety nets of today: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, unemployment insurance, bank deposit insurance and private pensions.

Though the finances of all of these are under severe pressure now and will need shoring up, they are still functioning and providing financial support to millions of Americans, whether employed, retired or jobless.

Frames of Reference

In short, in the past 75 years the world has learned how to prevent recessions from turning into cataclysmic depressions.

So if this recession is not likely to morph into a depression, what is more likely to happen?

I believe that better frames of reference are the last two bad U.S. recessions, in 1981-1982 and 1973-1975. Each lasted more than a year (about 16 months), with several single-digit quarterly declines in national output. Unemployment rates during those two slumps rose to the highest levels since the 1930s -- about 9% in 1974 and nearly 11% in 1982.

Many of today's middle-aged adults remember those recessions well, and they were awful. In the 1970s, the world was slammed by a ten-fold increase in oil prices -- far worse and longer lasting than the brief doubling of prices earlier this year, from which energy prices have now retreated to normal levels.

In the 1970s and early 1980s, high inflation pushed interest rates on business loans into the mid-teens and mortgages over 20%.

In the 1970s and early 1980s, the industrial heartland of American went through a massive restructuring, causing great pain in job losses but setting the stage for surging manufacturing productivity gains -- more output from fewer workers and hours worked -- during the late 1980s and 1990s.

Déjà Vu Anxiety

It should be noted that during these last two severe recessions, there was also deep anxiety, like today, about the possibility of another Great Depression looming.

I remember a cover story in Newsweek in mid-1982 that asked this very question. The question seemed plausible because the slump was severe, unemployment continued to rise, and people were scared. (For the record, Newsweek acknowledged the risk of depression but concluded it wouldn't happen.)

That summer turned out to be the darkest hour before the dawn. The Dow stocks ended their 16 years of price stagnation and took off like a skyrocket from a low of 777. And the broad economy entered a long, strong expansion of production and personal income.

As a business forecaster for some 30 years, I have learned never to say "never," so I'm not saying that a deep depression could not happen again. This year has been very humbling for forecasters. Things that I once thought to be inconceivable -- the collapse of AIG, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and the near bankruptcy of Detroit automakers -- have indeed come to pass.

When I hear my more pessimistic peers saying that this or that calamity "could happen" or "might happen," I do not dispute them because anything could or might happen.

Since the economic improvement won't be immediate -- indeed, things will get worse before they get better -- there is a risk that people will lose confidence in government plans before they are even implemented and act out their fears.

There is a risk that people who are able to consume normally -- secure in their jobs and earning what they always have -- will pull back unnecessarily and worsen the slump.

What's Likely?

At Kiplinger, we try to deal in likelihood and probability. And for all the reasons listed above, we believe it is likely that this slump can be contained to a duration and severity no greater, and probably less, than those of the slumps of the 1970s and early 1980s. And we believe that stock prices will start to recover when corporate earnings resume a modest upward path, probably near the end of next year.

Working our way through these challenges will be difficult and lengthy, with the fiscal hangover lasting many years. But as a nation, we seem to have decided that preventing near-term economic collapse is worth virtually any long-term cost.

Friday, 21 November 2008

Auto makers slash jobs

PARIS - FRANCE'S flagship car manufacturer PSA Peugeot Citroen slashed 3,550 jobs on Thursday as the global economic crisis cut a swathe through the world's auto sector.

Peugeot's news came as German luxury marque Daimler, Japanese truck maker Isuzu and car giant Mazda and Thailand's General Motors subsidiary announced similar cuts, in a market sapped by collapsing consumer confidence.

World manufacturing has been sucked into the storm whipped up by the global financial crisis, and job losses in the auto sector have contributed to the gloom haunting plunging stock markets.

Falling car sales are particularly bad news for France, where the sector plays a strategic role in the economy and directly or indirectly accounts for 10 percent of the jobs in the workforce.

Renault has already announced 6,000 job losses, including 4,900 in France, and Thursday's announcement saw the crisis cut deep into its larger competitor PSA Peugeot Citroen.

A statement from the firm said it hoped to trim headcount by 3,550 across all of its plants, including 850 at the factory in the western city of Rennes where it produces mid and high-end cars.

Peugeot hopes to make up these numbers through voluntary redundancies. A further 900 employees will be asked to leave Rennes and take up jobs elsewhere in France building smaller, cheaper vehicles.

'These measures are only aimed at employee volunteers,' Peugeot said. 'In this way, the group should be able to reduce its headcount without resorting either to a collective redundancy program with lay-offs or early retirements.'

Explaining the cutbacks, the company said European car sales would fall 17 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2008, and predicted: 'This recession will continue in 2009 (minimum forecast at least minus 10 percent).'

The German luxury car maker Daimler, meanwhile, will reduce the number of its temporary workers in Germany again, a spokeswoman told AFP, as the company sought to counter the effects of falling demand.

'We are going to reduce again the number of temporary workers and short-term contracts,' the spokesman said, while declining to say how many workers would be affected. German press reports estimated the figure at 570.

Outside Europe, it was a similar story.

Japan's Isuzu said it would axe 1,400 domestic posts and slash domestic production by 10 percent from an earlier target.

'With the way things are, we had no choice but to make adjustments,' said a spokesman for Japan's second-biggest truckmaker.

Mazda, Japan's fifth largest carmaker, said it would scrap 1,300 jobs. The group has lowered its production target for this financial year to 1.048 million vehicles, 48,000 units fewer than originally planned.

General Motors will halt assembly in Thailand for two months and shed 250 staff due to slow demand, a spokesman said on Thursday, as its struggling parent company pleaded for a bailout in the US.

The announcements on Thursday were only the latest in a series of job losses and plant closures to have swept through the industry since Aug, when fears over a collapse in the US sub-prime lending market triggered a credit crunch.

With their own jobs on the line, and credit deals harder to find, motorists turned their backs on new cars, placing the auto sector in the frontline as the financial crisis began to ravage the 'real economy.'

The US has been particularly hard hit, with lawmakers wrangling over a proposed US$25 billion (S$48 billion) government bail-out packages to save the 'Big Three' auto makers: General Motors, Ford and Chrysler. -- AFP

Fed: Economy to stay 'weak'

WASHINGTON - POUNDED by a fierce financial crisis, the country is sinking deeper into economic despair that has pushed the number of newly laid-off workers to a 16-year high, with problems likely to stretch well into next year.

With economic troubles cutting into customers' appetites, cost-cutting businesses dropped the axe harder.

New claims filed for unemployment insurance zoomed last week to 542,000, the highest since the summer of 1992, when the nation was recovering from a recession, the Labor Department reported Thursday.

The latest news on the crucial jobs market was worse than analysts expected. They had forecast a small decline in claims.

Meanwhile, the number of people continuing to draw jobless benefits climbed to more than 4 million, the highest in just over a quarter-century. Those figures partly reflect growth in the labor force, which has increased by about half since the early 1980s, but nonetheless underscore the difficulties of people trying to find work.

The grim news follows a gloomy outlook from the Federal Reserve and diminishing hope that Congress can secure a fresh US$25 billion (S$38 billion) rescue package for the tottering US auto industry before lawmakers quit for the year.

Despite a flurry of bold government actions, including a US$700 billion financial bailout package now being rolled out by the Treasury Department, financial and economic problems rage on.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson - who is overseeing the rescue effort - will deliver an assessment of the economy in a speech Thursday in Simi Valley, California.

Mr Paulson's outlook comes one day after the Federal Reserve dramatically lowered its projections for economic activity this year and next, and signaled that additional interest rate reductions may be needed to revive the economy.

Given all the worrisome economic news, Wall Street nosedived. The Dow Jones industrials on Wednesday lost 427 points, or about 5 per cent, at 7,997 - its lowest close since March 2003.

To cushion Americans from all the fallout, many economists believe the Fed will ratchet down its key interest rate - now at 1 per cent - by one-quarter or one-half per centage point on Dec. 16, the last session of the year for its policy-making committee.

The economy will log little, if any, growth this year, and could jolt into reverse, according to various Fed projections released on Wednesday. And, the frailty will extend into next year, the Fed said, where the economy could shrink or turn in subpar growth.

The economy 'would remain very weak next year' and 'the subsequent pace of recovery would be quite slow,' the Fed said in its new economic projections. 'The unemployment rate would increase substantially further.' The Fed projected that the national unemployment rate will rise to between 6.3 per cent and 6.5 per cent this year. That would be up sharply from last year's average rate of 4.6 per cent.

For 2009, the Fed expects the jobless rate to climb to between 7.1 per cent and 7.6 per cent.

General Motors Corp. CEO Rick Wagoner, meanwhile, warned the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday that the collapse of the US auto industry could lead to a loss of 3 million jobs within the first year.

Top Senate Democrats suggested a bill to rescue Detroit's Big Three was stalled, and they challenged the Bush administration to act to save the industry if congressional efforts falter. The White House rebuffed the suggestion.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada sought to lower expectations of reaching a deal on the US$25 billion proposal before Congress quits for the year. Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, called the possibility of reaching agreement 'remote.' Meanwhile, with economic slowdowns both in the United States and overseas, inflation will moderate, the Fed predicted.

On that front, American consumers got a reprieve and saw prices actually fall by a record amount in October, just a few months after getting hammered by runaway costs.

The shift away from inflation worries to a possible bout of dropping prices, or 'deflation', however, underscored just how quickly dangers faced by the economy can change in what many fear will be a painful recession.

For the average person, falling prices sure sounds like a good thing. But a prolonged and widespread price decline - which would drag down incomes, further clobber home and stock prices and shrivel corporate profits - would spell disaster for the economy. All that would make it harder for people and businesses to pay off debt.

America's last serious case of deflation occurred during the Great Depression of the 1930s. For now, economists think the chances are slim that the country will tip into a deflationary spiral. But they are not ruling it out, either.

The Fed, in documents on Wednesday, said 'more aggressive easing' of interest rates 'should reduce the odds of a deflationary outcome.' Once established, deflation is hard for Fed policymakers to break. That's partly because the Fed can lower its key rate only so far - to zero - to combat it. -- AP

Asia braces for economic crisis

MANILA (Philippines) - ASIAN countries led by economic powerhouses China and Japan want an expanded regional emergency fund in place next year to better shield the region from the impact of the global financial crisis, officials said on Thursday.

Senior finance officials of the Association of South-east Asian Nations and their counterparts from China, Japan and South Korea discussed in a one-day Manila meeting the details of the scheme, which will be finalized by their heads of state during an annual summit in Thailand next month.

The 10-nation Asean bloc comprises Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

The scheme calls for allowing all Asean countries, along with China, Japan and South Korea, to use emergency funds under the so-called Chiang Mai Initiative - an arrangement forged by Asian nations after the 1997 financial crisis to address foreign reserve deficits through bilateral currency swaps, Asean official Nathan Sundram told reporters.

During the meeting, financial officials from the Philippines and Thailand also proposed a separate Asian regional facility that could be tapped by any country to deal with short-term liquidity problems, Sundram said.

Details of expanding the Chiang Mai scheme's coverage, along with the Philippine and Thai proposal, will be discussed further in a Nov 27 meeting of finance officials in Japan, before Asian heads of state take them up next month, Sundram said.

Aside from the establishment of a quick-disbursing regional emergency fund, Asian nations should work to establish a surveillance system to detect signs of an emerging problem set off by the global crisis, said Philippine Finance Secretary Margarito Teves.

Ms Teves noted there was no clear warning before the United States was battered by the subprime mortgage crisis.

'Even the rating agencies were not able to detect that major institutions ... were having problems. They were rating them very, very high,' Ms Teves said on the sidelines of the Manila meeting.

Asian financial systems had less direct exposure to the toxic subprime mortgages that are wreaking havoc on US and European markets, but their export-driven economies are expected to take a major hit from a drop in exports and foreign investment. -- AP

Thursday, 20 November 2008

COE for small cars drops to historic low of S$2

SINGAPORE: The COE price for small cars, 1,600cc and below, fell by S$10,453 to a historic low of S$2 in the latest bidding exercise.

The next biggest fall was seen in the Open Category COE, which dropped S$3,601 to S$6,889. Open Category COEs are used mainly for cars.

For big cars (more than 1,600cc), the COE went down S$3,412 to S$4,889.

Meanwhile, the premium for commercial vehicles fell S$2,700 to S$6,189.

For motorcycles, the new COE price stood at S$1,012 — down S$497 from the previous bidding exercise.

The last time the COE price plunged in the small car category was in 2001 when it went down to S$101. And the COE price for big cars was a fluke S$50 in 1997.

Economic gloom deepens in Asia

TOKYO - JAPAN'S No. 3 bank joined larger rivals seeking to raise funds to counter growing bad loans, deepening the economic gloom in Asia on Wednesday, as markets fretted over the fate of the sinking US car industry.

The head of Nomura Holdings, Japan's biggest brokerage, offered a glimmer of hope, saying he thought the global liquidity crisis was over.

But he added the world's real economy was now the problem.

'The next issue depends on how the nations of the world supply financial support', particularly in China, Nomura Chief Executive Kenichi Watanabe told a media lunch.

Japan's third-largest bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, said it plans to issue preferred securities, becoming the latest Japanese bank to bolster its capital amid the financial crisis.

SMFG said it had not decided on the amount, but the Yomiuri newspaper reported earlier it planned raise about 400 billion yen (S$6.3 billion) to finance the redemption of outstanding preferred securities and beef up a capital base hit by a rise in bad loans.

Once thought to be relatively unharmed by the global credit crisis, Japanese banks are now scrambling to raise cash, as recession and plunging domestic stocks sap their capital.

Share prices in Seoul and Tokyo fell and the yen rose as risk-averse investors worried about the deepening damage to corporate profits and consumer spending despite a late rally on Wall Street.

Japan's Nikkei average fell 0.7 per cent, while MSCI's measure of stocks elsewhere in Asia-Pacific dipped 0.2 per cent.

'Market players are watching how stock markets react to developments (at US automakers)', said Mr Shuichi Kanehira, a senior currency trader at Mizuho Corporate Bank.

'Any negative news or comment about their future will support the yen', Mr Kanehira said.

Carmaker bailout
US 'Big Three' carmakers, facing resistance from the White House and some Congressional Republicans to a Democratic proposal to bail out their ailing industry, warned the US Senate Banking Committee of dire consequences absent a bailout plan.

'This is about much more than just Detroit. It's about saving the US economy from a catastrophic collapse', General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner said in written testimony.

GM, Ford Motor Co and Chrysler have been hit hard by a collapse in consumer spending triggered by the US housing crash and exacerbated by rising unemployment and months of soaring gasoline prices.

Sales are also slumping in the mature markets of Europe and Japan, and growth has slowed significantly in emerging markets such as India, China and Russia.

Japanese carmakers are also feeling the pinch.

Toyota Motor said it would stop production at all of its assembly, transmission and engine factories in the US and Canada for two extra days next month to work down bloated inventory.

Toyota has also cut its sales growth forecasts for China this year by half, to 20 per cent.

Nissan Motor said it was sticking to its slender profit forecast for this business year but CEO Carlos Ghosn warned of more tough times ahead.

'We have to recognise 2009 will be one of the most challenging years for our industry and the whole economy in the last 50 years', Mr Ghosn told the Wall Street Journal. 'I don't think anybody would be expecting peak performance'.

Nissan last month more than halved its net profit forecast for the year to March 31 to 160 billion yen, hit by the slowdown in demand and a stronger yen. -- REUTERS

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

Long road to US recovery

WASHINGTON - THE US Treasury said on Tuesday it would take time for the world's largest economy to begin to recover despite a massive financial bailout amid growing fears of a global recession.

Ailing US automakers pleaded for emergency help from lawmakers while Japan faced a grim outlook, with economics minister Kaoru Yosano saying he had 'no confidence at all' the world's second-biggest economy would grow next year.

But the head of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude Trichet, said he had not yet seen deflation trends in the eurozone, which has taken a hit from the global financial crisis.

'On both sides of the Atlantic as well as on both sides of the Channel, we are doing what is judged to be necessary in various situations,' Mr Trichet said.

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said American authorities were working to try to shore up the battered economy, but warned there was no immediate relief in sight.

'The crisis in our financial system had already spilled over into our economy and hurt it. It will take a while to get lending going and repair our financial system, which is essential to an economic recovery,' Mr Paulson said.

In testimony to the US Congress, he ruled out dipping into a US$700 billion (S$1 trillion) financial package to hand out aid to US automakers, saying the focus had to remain restoring the health of the financial sector.

The Democratic-controlled Congress is demanding President George W. Bush's Republican administration use some of the funds to rescue the embattled auto sector and curb an avalanche of mortgage foreclosures.

The chiefs of the 'Big Three' US automakers appealed for a share of the bailout fund, warning the whole economy would suffer if the firms went under.

'Without immediate bridge financing support, Chrysler's liquidity could fall below the level necessary to sustain operations,' said Chrysler chairman and chief executive Robert Nardelli.

Mr Nardelli warned a bankruptcy at any of the Big Three US automakers would have a 'devastating' impact on the economy and would cost significantly more than the US$25 billion in government-backed loans that Chrysler, General Motors and Ford have requested.

US stocks made modest gains Tuesday in another volatile day. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 151.71 points (1.83 per cent) to finish at 8,424.75 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq was virtually flat, up 1.22 points (0.08 per cent) at 1,483.27.

The broad Standard & Poor's 500 index advanced 8.36 points (0.98 per cent) to end at 859.11.

Equities markets in Asia and Europe suffered sharp losses however and oil prices fell in a market dominated by concerns over the effect of the slowing global economy on energy demand.

On the New York Mercantile Exchange, light sweet crude for December dropped 56 cents to close at US$54.39.

Investors also appeared uncertain where a much-needed fillip for the global economy would come from after world leaders at a weekend summit vowed to cooperate to bolster growth, but announced no specific measures.

Officials in Japan, which on Monday officially confirmed that it was in recession, said the country now faces the prospect of a full-year of no growth.

'In reality we see few factors that would contribute to positive growth' in the fiscal year starting next April, Economic and Fiscal Policy Minister Kaoru Yosano told reporters.

In Europe, the London FTSE 100 index was down 0.09 per cent in mid-afternoon trading, the Paris CAC 40 shed 0.21 per cent and the Dax in Frankfurt was flat.

Trading was suspended on both of Russia's main stock markets on Tuesday after they tumbled nearly five per cent in the early hours of dealing.

In Britain analysts raised the spectre of deflation, a fall in prices that can stifle growth, after official data showed that 12-month inflation fell to 4.5 per cent in October from a 16-year-high of 5.2 per cent in September.

The fear is that if deflation - a persistent fall in overall prices - takes hold, consumers will put off purchases. And that could drive down demand, employment and wages in a vicious spiral. -- AFP

NOL to cut 1,000 jobs

NEPTUNE Orient Lines will cut more than 1,000 jobs to reduce costs as the global recession reduces demand for moving sea cargo.

Most of the job cuts will be in North America, where its costs are the highest, the company said in a statement to the SGX on Wednesday morning before the market opened.

This is 'to place the company on a more sustainable footing through an expected severe and prolonged downturn in global container shipping', said the statement.

About 50 positions will be lost at its Singapore headquarters. The job cuts represent about 9 per cent of its 11,000-strong workforce.

Neptune Orient Lines is the parent company of container shipping line APL, based in Oakland, California.

The cuts come after NOL last month said it would reduce capacity between Asia and Europe by close to 25 per cent, and 20 per cent on the trans-Pacific route.

Those cuts will significantly reduce operating costs but the market has worsened considerably over the past month, the company said in a statement, forecasting a 'grim' outlook for profitability in 2009.

'The negative conditions we are seeing in the marketplace are unprecedented in our industry's history. This necessitates these very difficult decisions', said NOL's group president and chief executive officer Ron Widdows.

'This reflects our considered view that what we are seeing goes beyond a normal cyclical downturn'.

Mr Widdows said NOL's plan would lead to a restructuring charge of about US$33 million (S$50.44 million) in fourth quarter results, but this would 'deliver positive financial outcomes in future years'.

However, brokers say the firm's move to cut operating and overhead costs may not be enough to offset the slump in the shipping industry.

'While we are positive on the measures announced by NOL, the cost cutting initiatives may not be able to offset the severe top-line pressure', said CIMB-GK analyst Raymond Yap.

NOL last month reported that third-quarter net profit plunged 82 per cent.

Net profit for the three months to September was US$35 million, down from US$191 million in the same period in 2007 because of falling demand.

Container shippers, bulk operators and port authorities across Asia are reporting slowdowns in business while the global economy slows. Container shipping was hit first earlier this year as demand for Asian-made goods in the US and Europe dropped off.

In a chain reaction, the countless Asian factories churning out electronics and consumer items for the US and European markets began lowering output, and the need for raw materials declined.

Neptune Orient Lines is 66 per cent owned by Singapore's state-linked investment firm Temasek Holdings.

World freight prices collapse

LONDON - FREIGHT shipping prices for transporting dry raw materials collapsed in November, slammed by the global financial crisis, slowing economic growth and falling commodity prices, industry experts said.

The Baltic Dry Index, an indicator of economic trends which tracks the cost of moving goods such as coal, iron ore and grain across the oceans, has slumped over the past five months.

The index hit a record high of 11,793 points in May but has since fallen back to earth, hitting just 815 points last week - the lowest level since the end of 1999.

'The freight market has borne the brunt of both the financial sector crisis and the ensuing economic downturn,' said analysts at British-based emerging markets bank Standard Chartered.

Anecdotal reports suggest a significant part of this has been due to difficulty in arranging trade finance as a result of the credit crunch rather than lack of demand,' they said.

'Demand for commodities has also undeniably slowed, particularly for iron ore into China, which has an overwhelming impact on the dry freight market.'

Meanwhile, the Baltic Panamax Index, comprising of seven dry bulk routes, nosedived to 662 points last week - the lowest level since its creation in 1998 and compared with a record high 11,425 points five months ago.

Mr Georgi Slavov, head of dry freight research at ICAP Shipping in London, said freight prices sank because steelmaking companies, hit by falling prices, have sought to slash their transportation costs.

'The first trigger for the collapse of dry bulk freight rates was the sharp sell-off across the commodity sector, the most important for the short-term freight market being the steel price,' Mr Slavov told wires agencies.

'The fall, which began at the beginning of June, squeezed first the profit margins of producers since they faced fixed high raw material costs and falling prices for their finished products.'

'This was followed shortly by a squeeze of freight (costs) as they tried to pass the pressure from the profit margins to the freight market.'

Meanwhile, the chronic global financial crisis and slowing economic growth have ravaged demand for cargo ships.

Mr Sverre Svenning, director of Fearnley Consultants shipbrokers, said demand has been slashed because the global credit squeeze made it very difficult for buyers to attract funding.

'The buyers don't get credit, so they can't buy the commodity ... (and) they don't need any ships,' Mr Svenning said.

'It's definitely a reflection of the crisis affecting the real economy.'

The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) said earlier this month that the financial crisis had begun to affect international trade, noting sharp falls to key shipping indices.

The UN agency said in its annual maritime transport review that the world's merchant fleet had expanded to a record 1.12 billion deadweight tons, with the order book for new vessels reaching a peak of 10,053 ships in 2008.

However, from mid-2008, companies were cancelling new ships on order.

Mr Svenning said 'it's a lack of demand. Lots of people are stuck with high (commodity) inventories with high costs and they are simply sitting tight at doing nothing right now.'

'So there has been an imbalance between supply of transportation capacity and demand for this transportation capacity.'

Looking ahead, Standard Chartered analysts predicted that freight prices could rebound in the coming months.

'As inventories are run down over the next few months, particularly in the steel industry, a rebound in freight will become more possible,' they said.

'Growing reports of cancelled orders for new vessels increase the risk of extreme upward pressure on freight rates once more as the global economy begins to recover from this cyclical downturn in 2010.' -- AFP

Global liquidity crisis over

TOKYO - THE global liquidity crisis appears to be over but much work remains to be done to rebuild the economic damage wrought by months of financial turmoil, the head of Japan's top broker said on Wednesday.

'The liquidity crisis in the financial world is over. The next step is how to rebuild the real economy,' Mr Kenichi Watanabe, chief executive of Nomura Holdings, told reporters.

'This of course involves each country's fiscal spending,' he said.

'People are paying attention to how respective governments gun their engines,' he said in reference to world leaders pledging at the recent G20 summit to galvanise economic growth.

Global banks and financial markets have been hammered by the credit crunch that began with a wave of defaults on US mortgages.

Mr Watanabe said China would be vital in an Asian economic recovery.

'When considering the Asian region as a whole, people's interest lies in how China ignites its engine,' he said.

Nomura Holdings, which moved quickly to buy the Asian and European operations of failed Wall Street bank Lehman Brothers, lost about 1.5 billion dollars in the first half of this financial year because of turmoil in world markets.

Watanabe said Nomura aims to return to profit 'as soon as possible,' helped by the acquisition of Lehman's customer base and expertise in financial products.

'Because our business is closely correlated with the business and financial environment which is currently very severe, we are in a very difficult situation,' he said. -- AFP

Sign of the times

Courtesy of Conrad Alvin Lim



The signs have been there for a while but they are now starting to show themselves slowly but surely. This is not the time to indulge and definitely the time to be prudent. With Hong Kong, Italy and Germany now in recession and global retail sales falling sharply, I definitely think it is time to re-asses our finances.

Several Gatherings ago and during several Previews in July and August, I mentioned that a friend of a friend who is a head-hunter, noticed a spike in his list of senior executives, especially amongst bankers. In recessions past, this was always a precursor of worse things to come and true to form, DBS starts cutting jobs 5 months later. Now it is only going to get gloomier.

Job losses are the first sign of things to come. Especially when companies kick out the older teams and keep the younger ones. I feel for those who’ve lost out. I cannot imagine what it must be like to have worked all your life for this company and more than the job loss, it must be so emotionally painful to get lopped off like an unwanted and unappreciated … thing. And more will lose their jobs in the weeks to come. This is inevitable. What are these older workers expected to do?

Still, many are still living in the denial that “It won’t happen to me.”

The problem of unemployment amongst the older workers is not helped by the fact that a lot of the older generation are about to lose all their hard earned life’s savings as they realize the total liability on their investment products. It’s got to hurt but I can’t sympathize because greed and ignorance don’t marry well and will always come at a cost.

Certain observations are revealing more signs of worse things to come.

Rentals have been falling over the last few weeks. This is a sign that home prices will start falling about three to four weeks later and today’s ST confirmed that higher end HDB flats are going to fall. With that, expect a domino effect in the property market. As prices dip, those who have been hanging on to high speculative prices will be forced to sell at lower prices as personal liquidity takes a toll on them, the longer this recession drags on. Owners of hopeful en-bloc projects will start to question the wisdom of holding on to a stubbornly high bid while the developers hold back for bargain prices. It will be a drastic dip, have no illusions about it. As people lose their jobs and liquidity worsens, they will be forced to sell and downgrade. Flat owners of 3 and 4 room HDB flats will have a boom while larger units dip further. Already, property agents are banging on my 3 room HDB flat with “ready” buyers … very much like how my agent was banging 3 room doors when I was bankrupt and looking for a smaller place.

The slow and optimistic turn around for the property sector will be the increasing demand for rentals but this will be hampered by the departure of many foreign workers as the economy weakens further and employers start cutting back on manpower. These foreigners may just pack up and leave as things get more and more miserable for them.

Pray that they can go home because I would hate to think what desperate and stranded foreign workers will resort to doing in order to survive. In fact, I reckon we’ll have more than enough problems from the desperate locals without needing the extra “help” from foreigners.

Lower home prices and rentals won’t translate into lower business rentals. Landlords, wise to ailing economies, will hold on to their rental rates in anticipation of a return to normal business operations in a matter of time. Being deep pocketed, they won’t see the need to lower rentals and will continue to hold out on current rates. This will surely see many smaller companies fold and add to the unemployment statistics. There is an increasing demand for debt collectors and the stark rising statistic is the claims against smaller companies. Watch for more activity around the Small Claims Courts, Ministry of Manpower and the CPF board. This will get uglier in the coming weeks.

Car owners amoungst the younger workforce are going to face a real delimna … many of them have flashy new cars that are financed 100% by an institution. It may not mean anything now but when the crunch hits, those that are not able to carry on ownership of these vehicles, will not be able to sell them unless they top up their payments first. This is going to be a major problem because they won’t be able to afford the top up … they wouldn’t have to sell the car if they could afford the top up. Thus, they can’t carry on paying for it and they can’t sell it. Watch out for a rise in “car thefts” and “accidental fires” and a rise in insurance premiums.

The other common practice that is going to get a lot of people into a crunch is the Credit Card and “easy” finance schemes. Banks have successfully gotten a fair amount of the population into the American culture of “spend first, worry later”. Well, the time to worry is dawning and already, the debt collectors are busy running around recouping outstanding monies from people who are overseas on vacations they can’t afford.

Am I imagining things or are homocides and irrational deaths on the rise? I can’t explain how terrible one must feel if one thinks that literally throwing himself to the tigers must seem like a better alternative than continuing a life of misery. Suicides, robberies and misdemeanors seem to be common fodder for the press lately. Almost everyday, shit happens. This was also the case in 1987, 1997 and 2001; Just a reminder, I will always remember those dates for as long as I live even though I wasn’t even trading then.

Another pattern to look out for if you are looking for hope, is when the press starts reporting record numbers of bankruptcy filings. This report usually marks the economic bottom but it never always translates into a recovery period. It just means that we’re as low as we can go. So in about a year from now, start hanging out at the Supreme Court and count the number of people with blue papers and see if the numbers are decreasing on a daily basis. An easier way is to watch the classified ads and keep an eye for Writs of Seizures, Sheriff’s or Bailiff’s Sales, Notices of Insolvency and Bankruptcy filings. I am sure the number of pages will increase.

People I meet always ask me the same tired question … how long will it last and how bad will it be?

Honestly, who knows? I am preparing for the worst and will not be hopeful of any recovery for the next 2 years at the least. I also don’t expect a real return to a bullish market before 2012. Yup … I am pessimistic, and for good reason. If you’ve been bankrupt, you’ll know to always expect the worse and that it can happen to you … regardless of who you are and how rich you are. Bankruptcy is unbiased and deserving for those who get it.

One other pattern I’ve noticed is in the malls … less middle aged shoppers and a continued strength in younger shoppers. This is easy to translate - the younger generation don’t or haven’t grasped the severity of the current economic climate because they will get to keep their jobs while the older workers worry like hell. How sweet it is to be young and ignorant. Enjoy it while it lasts, kids.

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

When layoffs lead to nasty office politics

By Anne Fisher, senior writer

Dear Annie: I work in an office with about 40 peers (and 2 bosses), and rumors are rife that about 10 or 12 of us are going to get laid off as part of the latest cost-cutting drive. The situation has really brought out the worst in some of my colleagues, who are kissing up to the bosses, spreading damaging gossip about certain people, and generally acting in ways that are, in my opinion, highly unprofessional. Should I just ignore all this, or would it be smart to point out to higher-ups (discreetly) that there is a lot of self-serving behavior going on here? -Avoiding the Water Cooler

Dear AWC: If your bosses aren't already aware of your colleagues' Machiavellian maneuvers - and I bet they are - then telling them what's going on is just going to look self-serving on your part (and, let's be frank here, rightly so). No surprise: A recent survey of 522 office workers found that more than half (53%) say underhanded behavior has increased at work lately.

"In times of uncertainty and rising unemployment, some people feel insecure, which leads them to start trying to curry favor with decision-makers any way they can," says Jon Zion, CEO of staffing firm Accountemps, which hired an independent research firm to conduct the survey a couple of months ago. "It's a mistaken strategy because, in general, office politics just drains productivity and damages morale. You're far better off staying focused on your job. In the end we're all measured on results."

A cynic would say that's not always entirely true but, on the other hand, we've all known people who have aimed to undermine a colleague and ended up shooting themselves in the foot. Still, only 29% of those surveyed said that it's best to steer clear of office politics completely. A majority, 54%, opined that the smart course is to be aware of what's going on without getting directly involved. The other 16% said that "it's best to participate [in political maneuvering] so you can get ahead."

Zion and his colleagues divide that small group into five distinct types. See if any of these sound familiar:

1. The Pundit. "This is the person who sits around at lunch, or hangs around the water cooler, endlessly speculating about 'what's really going on' and seeming to have inside information," observes Zion. "Every once in a while, usually just by coincidence, these people turn out to be right." Tempting as it may be to listen - "after all, knowledge is power," he notes - the worst thing you can do is give the Pundit any information about anything: "You never know how it will get twisted."

2. The Lobbyist. A vocal advocate of his or her projects, and often skilled at getting other people to go along, the Lobbyist "may be unreceptive to outside points of view," Zion says. "It's okay to support this person's agenda, but you need to be careful not to get run over. Make sure your own point of view gets heard."

3. The Covert Operator. "These are not hard to spot," says Zion. "They're the people trying to use manipulation rather than excellent work to get ahead - and they can be very charming, so keep your guard up." You might even show the Covert Operator that you're on to him, by politely objecting when he puts down a colleague or takes credit for someone else's work.

4. The Activist. Enthusiasm is contagious, so you may find yourself getting swept up in this person's cause. "An Activist can be a very persuasive and aggressive advocate for what he or she believes is the right thing to do," Zion says. But watch out: "You don't necessarily want to be identified with a cause that doesn't benefit your employer's big-picture goals," says Zion. "You're at work to do a job, not to get caught up in extraneous stuff that, 9 times out of 10, isn't going to benefit you."

5. The Advisor. "This is an interesting type," says Zion, "because this person is often closely aligned with a company's top leadership and serves as senior managers' eyes and ears." Advisors don't always rank high in the official pecking order: "The Advisor could be anybody - a senior aide or an administrative assistant." Don't kiss up, but don't alienate this person, either: "Advisors wield considerable behind-the-scenes influence, so a decent rapport with them could ultimately work in your favor."

If there's any job security at all these days, Zion says, it depends not on sneaky tactics but on being really great at your actual job.

"The important thing is to concentrate on your performance, demonstrate to your bosses why you are indispensable, and not get embroiled in office politics," he says. Easier said than done, but look at it this way: If you stand out as a star performer, then even if you do get laid off, at least you'll have terrific references for your job hunt.

Readers, what do you say? Have office politics gotten nastier at your shop lately? What type of behavior bothers you the most or seems to cause the most trouble? Any tips for handling office politics? Post your thoughts on the Ask Annie blog.

Monday, 17 November 2008

Advice from CNA forummer - Richard the Lion Heart

This is in a nutshell what took place.

1. Sub-prime market emerges. Banks cannot get involved in the sub-prime space because of regulatory requirement for deposit banks and their traditional risk model that allow them to play only in the A & B prime segments but not the C & D sub-prime segments.
2. Financial companies not banks undertake loan risk for the C & D segments [sub-prime].Not governed by Central Banks
3. Financial companies [Fincos] start servicing the california real estate market. Funds obtain via issuing of commercial notes with a tenure of 270 days and requires roll-over if not securtised.
4. Biggest fincos are Countrywide, WMC who are mortgage originators working with brokers in-house and external who begin to provide loans on stated income known as liar's loan as no income verification takes place.
5. Contracted loans are then securitised by off loading to the Investment Banks which do not have same regulations as deposit taking banks. Ratings agencies step in to grade packages that are bundled with prime and sub-prime loans. Grading is then given to packages, packages are unitised and sold to wealthy investors, financial companies and Banks. Some end with up Tan Kin Lian's favorite people.
6. Everything is hunky dory as the california real estate is on upwards trends since the last bust in the 80s and rest of US follows. Any default is covered by rising house prices over original valuation and defaulting homeowners actually get some money back.
7. Economy is on a roll, slight hiccup with dot.com in the 90s when t-shirt clad nerds realise that not everyone can be Bill. Greenspan starts to move closer to Jesus and Mohammed and knows no wrong
8. Supply of houses begin to outstrip demand in Arnold's patch. Rest of the country shows similar symptoms. Negative equity becomes a looming reality and the rest of world finds out that these are non-recourse loans unlike mortagages in most countries like Singapore and OZ.
9. Securtised loans known as CDOs are thrown back to originators when they default , investment banks still cool until they realise that originators are no longer solvent, nable to handle the throwback. Panic sets in
Bears & Stern slides, CEO of Standard & Poor sacked as a result of complaint by EU. So much for Women leading businessess.
10. Then we find out that insurance were also in the party by issuing credit default swaps which is akin to selling a guarantee to Liberace that he won't die.
11. Loss of confidence in the capiltal markets as bank fear lending to each other as they have no idea how much is the exposure to CDO and related instruments. Commercial Paper disappears since its first appearence in 1952.
12. Liquidity dries up completely. Central Banks around the world begin relentless cash injections. Effort fail.
13. Key is the US and Paulson launches plan with no details. Congress wavers, markets beging to plunge
14. Congress passes bill, signs of backstop emerges, second effort of funding by central banks begins.
15. Commercial Paper Funding Facility by Fed commences on 27th Oct, markets beging a slow and erratic climb


Here are basic features of this crisis
A. Its once in a lifetime event. Its essentially a collapse of the capital model in totality that was built up since 1952.
B. The poison has yet to flow out completely from the system. Note the emergence of Pinnacle notes and expect mor. There are tranches of CDOs that will be classffied as defaults when US housing keeps going down.
C. This is not the time to buy low for equities or properties as the unknown is rather big. Keep cash and preferabbly in SGD as it is small enough to be manipulated by the local government and they will do it to keep their asset value intact.
D. Govts of the world and the press will continue to give positive news and rightlyfully so to prevent total collapse. But do take it with a pinch of salt. The cash injections over the last 3 mthds are taking rather slow to work.
E. Gold is not a safe option. It has a very inverse correlation to USD and so expect swings.
F. Do not get upset with yourself and family members if you purchased any of the instruments that failed. It was not something that was expected.
G. The people that should swing from the gallows are the rating agencies like Standqard and Poor.
H. Just stay put with cash in the bank, delay any investment decisions, watch the US housing foreclosure trends, the unemployements and consumer spending rates.
I. Do not screw yourself over cross rate activity such as parking in foreign currencies or taking a SGD loan for a foreign propeerty and vice versa.
J. Don't acquire collectibles, the value such things are in your head and in the valuation catalogue.
K. Don't visit any financial planner, consultant, private banker except to do taxation and estate planning activity. They were not assigned by god to look after you. They have to make a living and they can only do that if they sell investments. If you think, there is no commission, then Paris Hilton is a virgin
L. Singapore is particularly hit as it is a financial centre and its depends on the world. OZ and Malaysia are 2 there might be hum along.

Once again, its a collapse of a model and this has never happenned before in this manner or scale. Even the great depression was not a collapse of a model.

Friday, 14 November 2008

Hong Kong in recession

HONG KONG - HONG KONG slipped into recession in the third quarter as the global economic slowdown took its toll on the financial hub, government figures showed on Friday.

Hong Kong's gross domestic product fell 0.5 per cent from the previous quarter on a seasonally adjusted basis, following a fall of 1.4 per cent in the second quarter, the Census and Statistics Department said in a statement.

'The growth of the Hong Kong economy slowed notably further in the third quarter, as the external sector slackened amid the faltering global demand,' said government economist Helen Chan, in the statement.

'And as domestic demand towards the end of the quarter was severely hit by the outbreak of the global financial tsunami that caused significant jitters in the local asset markets.'

The standard definition for recession is two consecutive quarters of falling GDP.

The announcement means Hong Kong now joins Singapore, Germany, New Zealand and Italy in reporting a technical recession as the global slowdown bites into economies across the world.

Hong Kong cut its full-year 2008 GDP forecast to between 3 and 3.5 per cent from the previous 4 and 5 per cent, but kept its forecast for inflation at 4.2 per cent for the full year. Last year, Hong Kong's economy grew 6.4 per cent. -- AFP

Read also:

The next big crisis

NEW YORK: Just as the financial credit crisis seemed to be waning, another, potentially bigger crisis, has begun: the consumer crisis. This crisis is global in nature but is most dire in the United States.
As a measure of how dire, the US government has abandoned its plan to buy up banks' toxic mortgage debts and will use some bailout funds to help consumers.

Announcing this on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the consumer credit market has frozen. In recent years, sales of securities provided the funding for 40 per cent of consumer loans, Mr Paulson said.

Lenders issued US$42.5 billion (S$64.2 billion) worth of such securities in October last year. Last month, they issued less than 2 per cent of that.

'This market...has for all practical purposes ground to a halt,' Mr Paulson said at the news briefing. 'Today, the illiquidity in this sector is raising the cost and reducing the availability of car loans, student loans and credit cards. This is creating a heavy burden on the American people and reducing the number of jobs.'

US consumers, who usually account for about 70 per cent of economic activity, are slamming their wallets shut as they worry about retirement funds and job security. These changes could tilt the economy into a deeper recession.

On Wednesday, the No. 1 US electronics retailer Best Buy warned of a nightmare before Christmas, slashing its earnings forecast and saying changes in consumer behaviour have been nothing less than 'seismic'. This comes just days after its main US rival Circuit City filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The tech industry is not immune. Intel, the world's largest computer chips producer, warned on Wednesday sales could fall as much as 19 per cent in the fourth quarter. Intel's and previous forecasts suggest the industry is about to enter a slump to rival or exceed the dot.com bust of 2001.

ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES, WASHINGTON POST

financial crisis on China 'worse than expected':Wen Jiabao

Impact of financial crisis on China 'worse than expected': Wen
1 day ago

BEIJING (AFP) — China's Premier Wen Jiabao said the effect of the global financial meltdown on the country was "worse than expected," state media said Thursday, in a sign of growing concern at the impact of the crisis.

Wen was quoted as making the assessment by the director of the National Bureau of Statistics Ma Jiantang when he briefed his staff on Tuesday, according to the website of the bureau's newspaper China Information News.

"The impact of the global financial crisis on the Chinese economy is much worse than many had expected," Ma said according to the website, passing on remarks made by Wen.

China initially said the global financial crisis would not cause too much harm to its economy, but in recent days the signals from Beijing have changed markedly.

Wen's comment comes after the Chinese government unveiled a four trillion yuan (586 billion dollars) economic stimulus plan on Sunday aimed at boosting domestic consumer demand in the face of flagging exports.

Economic group says developed world in recession

By Pan Pylas, AP Business Writer
Economic group says developed world in recession, set to contract by 0.3 percent next year

LONDON (AP) -- The world's developed economies, hard hit by the financial crisis, have slid into recession and will shrink further in 2009, a top international organization said Thursday.

In its latest economic forecasts, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said gross domestic product was likely to fall by 0.3 percent in 2009 for its 30 member countries, representing democracies with market economies.

It said the U.S. economy would contract next year by 0.9 percent, Japan's by 0.1 percent and the euro area by 0.5 percent.

Additionally, it was the first time since 1974-5, when they were suffering from the Arab oil embargo and a severe bear market for stocks, that the U.S., Europe and Japan have fallen into recession.

This time, all three are shrinking in the same year; in the wake of the first oil price shock in 1973, Japan saw negative growth in 1974 followed a year later by the U.S. and Europe.

And it was the first time the organization has seen an aggregate shrinkage in its members economies since it started keeping records in 1970.

The latest forecasts represent a sharp downgrade since the last set in June, when the OECD forecast OECD growth of 1.7 percent in 2009 and indicated that the worst of the financial crisis might have passed. Since then though, the outlook for the world economy has deteriorated sharply in the wake of the banking crisis, which is rapidly spreading to the wider economy.

For the fourth quarter, the organization said its members would likely see a contraction of 1.4 percent on a year-on-year basis, with the U.S. down 2.8 percent, and Japan and the euro area 1.0 percent lower. Negative growth will be recorded through the second quarter of 2009, meeting the technical definition of recession as two or more consecutive quarters of negative growth.

"The OECD area economy appears to have entered recession," said Jorgen Elmeskov, director of the policy studies branch and the OECD's economics department. He said that while the picture was uncertain "projections point to a protracted downturn" with recovery not likely before the second half of next year, with the U.S. leading the way out of recession.

The OECD's bleak assessment of the world economy came as Germany officially sank into recession. Official figures showed that Germany's gross domestic product contracted by 0.5 percent in the July-September period compared with the previous quarter. The fall was much steeper than the 0.2 percent predicted by economists.

That fall followed a 0.4 percent drop in output in the second quarter, which was the first decline since late 2004.

The OECD identified a number of risks to its outlook, not least the possibility of a longer than anticipated return to normal in financial markets. It said its projections assume that the financial stress since the banking crisis exploded in mid-September will prove to be "short-lived" but be followed by an "extended period of financial headwinds" through the end of next year, with conditions then returning to near normal.

Other hazards include further failures of financial institutions; emerging market economies being hit harder by the downturn in global trade, and foreign investors turning even more more risk-shy.

More hopeful possibilities included a quicker than expected adjustment in bank balance sheets following concerted measures by management, central banks and governments around the world to shore up their finances, and more substantial fiscal stimulus measures from governments in the form of higher spending and lower taxes.

However, Elmeskov said any government measures should be "timely and temporary and designed to so as to ensure maximum effectiveness" and that a credible framework is in place to ensure budget responsibility in the long-term.

Tax cuts aimed at credit-starved consumers might prove effective, he added.

This weekend's meeting of the Group of 20 industrialized and emerging economies in Washington is expected to back coordinated tax cuts or spending boosts around the world.

The OECD also put its weight behind efforts to bolster the regulatory framework for the financial world, in particular to increase transparency and prevent a recurrence of the financial aspects of the crisis, which started with the collapse of the market for bonds based on U.S. mortgages to people with shaky credit.

"It will also be necessary to re-examine the features of the regulatory and supervisory framework that created incentives for excessive risk-taking and led financial institutions to increase leverage in non-transparent ways to levels that proved to be unsustainable," said Elmeskov.

Though the leaders of the G-20 will be discussing reform proposals, final agreements on concrete measures are expected to wait until after President-elect Barack Obama enters the White House in January.

DBS starts to axe staff

IT WAS a day of tears, tension and disappointment at DBS Bank on Thursday as the first of hundreds of employees were told that they had been laid off.

It is unclear how many staff lost their jobs on Thursday but a DBS spokesperson said most of those earmarked to go will be told by Friday night.

The start of the layoffs did bring a degree of relief to the 7,600 bank staff here who have been nervously waiting to see where and when the axe would fall.

A woman in the corporate banking department told The Straits Times outside the bank's Shenton Way base: 'No one could focus today. It's like our September 11 - the atmosphere was so tense.

'No one, not even MDs (managing directors) knew who would be the next to go. Everyone was just waiting for the phone call. I'm just glad this day is almost over. But we have one more day to get through.'

Experienced managing directors were some of the first to be told they were no longer needed.

One aged 55 told The Straits Times: 'I've given more than two decades of service to the bank. Of course I'm disappointed with the organisation.'

After arriving at his office as usual, he was summoned to human resources by telephone yesterday morning and let go immediately.

At around 4pm in the afternoon, as he walked down to his car, which was loaded with boxes of personal effects, he shook hands with colleagues he had worked with for many years. Others patted him on his back.

'I feel like this could have been done in a different way,' he said.

Higher-end HDB mkt cooling?

By Jessica Cheam
THE higher-end of the public housing market is showing its first signs of cooling, with the Housing Board's latest condo-style flats receiving a lacklustre response.

With only one day left to the closing of applications, Natura Loft at Bishan has drawn about 600 applications for 480 flats, its developer told The Straits Times yesterday.

This is in stark contrast to the previous three projects built under HDB's design, build and sell scheme (DBSS), which attracted overwhelming demand.

The first project, Premiere @ Tampines, was a hit, with 6,000 applications for 616 homes; City View @ Boon Keng had 3,500 buyers vying for 714 flats while the third project, Park Central at Ang Mo Kio, drew 2,300 bids for 578 units.

Industry watchers say Natura Loft is a victim of the latest turn in market sentiment, which has seen companies retrenching staff and economies worldwide entering recession.

'Announcements such as DBS Bank laying off 900 jobs has caught everyone off-guard, and local sentiment has turned very bad,' said Mr Colin Tan, head of research and consultancy at Chesterton Suntec International.

Other analysts such as ERA Asia-Pacific's assistant vice-president Eugene Lim said Natura Loft's pricing was 'on the high side'.

'The pricey units were launched at a time when the market is jittery, making a double whammy for the project,' he said

Thursday, 13 November 2008

Mass lay-offs come to Asia: DBS cuts 900 jobs

Simon Mortlock

DBS is slashing 900 staff - mainly in Singapore and Hong Kong - as Q3 net profit slumps by 38%.

It’s the biggest sign yet that Asian banks aren’t immune from the global financial crisis and aren’t afraid to hammer their headcounts.

The bank’s decision introduces an unwanted new arrival to the Asian employment scene: the Wall Street-style three-figure mass lay-off. So far most banks have been comparatively timid with their recent trimming in the region, with 100 redundancies considered a large number.

And at 6% of its entire workforce, the local DBS bloodbath is proportionally higher than some of the global redundancies at much larger banks. Morgan Stanley, for example, has cut about 1,330 jobs this year – less than 3% of its headcount.

DBS chief executive Richard Stanley says in statement that most of the cuts, to be carried out at the end of November, will come from its offices in Singapore and Hong Kong.

“To be a streamlined organisation, I believe we must run a tighter ship…We have been vigilant on costs but as the economy enters a more difficult and uncertain phase, many financial institutions around the world and in Asia have made headcount reductions,” he adds.

The global financial crisis and bigger provisions have reduced market-related income at DBS. Third quarter net profit totaled SG$379m, down from SG$610m in the same period last year.

DBS would not comment on which job functions would bear the brunt of the costs.

An already depressed recruitment market must now cope with hundreds of new job seekers.

Singaporean and laid off on Wall Street

Anonymous

A very wise manager of mine once said to me, “There will always be those who should not have been let go, but were, and those who should be let go, but weren’t.” I didn’t realise then that one day I would have to draw strength from his words.


In 2004, I came to the USA from Singapore for college, and like many others from Asia, I was extremely excited at the prospect of being in the epicentre of global finance. Being female, the only child of doting parents from a traditional middle-class Chinese family, I wanted to prove to my mum and dad that I could stick it out on my own.


I am extremely grateful to my parents for being supportive and for standing up to my extended family for the choice I made to spend a handsome sum to study abroad. My parents believed in my potential and it strengthened my resolve to provide a blissful retirement for them. To save on tuition fees, I crammed in more classes and graduated in three years.


After snagging an internship and then a job offer at a Wall Street investment bank, hopes were high that my career was set and that I had achieved my goal. I would work 15-hour days, was frequently the last to leave, and was usually in the office at weekends: all part of my rite of passage as the only analyst in my team.


However long the hours might have been, the silver lining was always that I was young, starting my career in New York, and was basically being paid to learn among experienced bankers. I was living comfortably and was able to send a good portion of my pay back to my parents.


Unfortunately, when the markets turned sour earlier this year, and US banks went bust or merged, my whole team was basically let go.


News of my layoff was unexpected – I even got lost on my way to human resources to collect my documents. I felt a whirl of problems overwhelming me. Rent? Visa? Parents? My mental maths told me that my savings could last until my lease expired next July, but my visa would only last till January.


In the past, my dad had mentioned retiring next year, but recently he had told me he would like to work for another few years. Maybe he saw this coming. It absolutely wrenched me that there might be the slightest possibility that he had changed his mind because he was concerned about finances, about me.


As much as my American colleagues tried to console me that the whole banking industry is in trouble, I hesitated to share my deeper concerns, due to cultural and socio-economic differences. I wasn’t even sure if I could confide in my Asian peers, many of whom came from much cushier backgrounds.

It has been about two weeks since I began my job search, and I have had two interviews. While I am open to international relocation, I am still focusing my search on the States, for a few reasons: 1) my lease expires in July 2009 and it will be hard to find a replacement tenant; 2) moving back to Singapore would likely be a one-way ticket if I do not pursue an MBA; 3) jobs in the finance industry in Asia are also in decline and banks there have been cutting staff; 4) I am still hopeful to be able to work on a variety of transactions, involving sophisticated investors, which are often harder to come by in Asia. However, in this economic climate, my job search is on a global basis and I will relocate in accordance to need.

However, in the grand scheme of life, my problems are still nothing compared to those of people with children and mortgages. Despite my anguish, there is still a lot to be thankful for. A silver lining, that’s what we could all hope for.

Financial storm hits home

BY RACHEL CHAN

AN OVERWHELMING majority of people in Singapore say they are feeling the impact of the worsening global economic crisis, with many already taking steps to deal with it.

This is borne out in the inaugural SPH Web-Panel Poll conducted by the Research, Analysis and Planning Department (RAPD) of Singapore Press Holdings for my paper. The survey was conducted between Oct 23 and 27.

It sought to gain insight on Singapore residents' reactions to the economic crisis, and how they are coping with it.

A staggering 86 per cent of 487 respondents said they have been affected by the crisis, with 56 per cent of this group cutting back on dining at restaurants and opting for more affordable meals at hawker centres instead.

For example, Ms Tan Mei Ling, 30, an advertising executive, said that while she eats out every day for lunch, she has stopped frequenting mid-range restaurants.

Instead, she chooses to eat at hawker centres and makes sure her meals cost less than $10.

'It's a big pinch as I'm a foodie and I hate scrimping on food,' she said.

'But it's more important to try to save some cash these days, as opposed to splurging.'

Bank executive C.L. Yong, 33, said: 'I'm more careful with my spending. I used to go out every Friday for drinks with friends, but I've stopped for the past two months.

'Instead, I either go to coffee shops for a coffee or beer with friends or stay at home reading, surfing the Internet, chatting online with friends or playing online games.'

A check with Japanese restaurants Ichiban Boshi and Ichiban Sushi appears to bear out the findings.

A spokesman said: 'Business is still brisk, though we are seeing shorter queues.'

The Singapore situation is not unique in Asia-Pacific. According to the results of the twice-yearly MasterCard Worldwide Index released yesterday, consumer confidence in the region has turned 'increasingly pessimistic'.

It reported that 70 per cent of consumers in places such as Vietnam, China, India, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore are tightening their belts by cutting down on discretionary expenses.

The SPH Web-Panel Poll results are in sync with Master-Card's findings.

In the SPH survey, 43 per cent of those who said that they have been affected by the downturn are cutting down on their shopping.

Furthermore, 35 per cent are now staying home to watch television shows instead of clubbing or going to the cinema, and a fifth of the respondents are cancelling their year-end overseas vacation.

For instance, production manager Tan Kaili, 25, is glad that she and her family will be going to nearby Vietnam for their vacation early next month.

'I won't be planning any long-haul trips in the near future. If I'm going on a solo vacation, my budget should preferably not exceed $600,' she said. Revealingly, the respondents aren't completely downbeat about the situation.

While 81 per cent of them believe times ahead would be getting tougher, they are also a pragmatic lot who understand that the financial crisis is a global one, and that Singaporeans can't do much about it.

Most of the respondents ' about seven out of 10 ' say they have full trust in the Government's ability to tackle the problem and protect the interests of Singaporeans.

'I think Singaporeans have an inherent trust in the Government as it's seen us through bad times before,' said communications consultant Foo Ling Feng, 29.

'The Government also has reserves that it may use, should it decide to step in with any bailout plans in the future.'

Surprisingly, only 29 per cent of the 384 working adults surveyed were fearful of losing their jobs or retrenchment.

Also, just over half of the respondents have not changed any of their saving habits yet.

Most also expected the crisis to peter out in one to three years' time.

Asked to name the culprits who caused the current crisis, about 77 per cent of the respondents blamed the lack of checks and balances in the world's financial system as the No. 1 factor, which led to the exploitation of the system by the greedy and corrupt.

Avaricious bankers and shoddy oversight by government agencies came in second (71 per cent) and third (64 per cent), respectively.

Also, two in five people also felt that the financial crisis has undermined their trust in local banks, while half felt the financial crisis had affected their attitude towards life insurance.

The people polled in the SPH survey are between 16 and over 50 years of age, with close to 70 per cent being professionals, managers, executives and businessmen.

S$ to weaken against US$

THE Singapore dollar is set to weaken sharply to $1.80 against the greenback within the next year, leading United States investment bank Morgan Stanley has predicted.

On Wednesday night, the exchange rate was about S$1.50 to the US dollar.

Morgan Stanley believes Singapore, like many export-oriented nations, will experience a more than expected weakness in its currency ahead.

However the Government is likely to endorse this currency weakness in order to support exports amid the global downturn. A weaker Singdollar generally makes exports relatively cheaper.

Mr Stephen Jen, the US bank's global head of currency research, made the prediction here on Wednesday at the Morgan Stanley Asia Pacific Summit.

He said the weakening of the local unit will be the result of not only a resurgent US dollar, but also an aggressive policy by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to protect this export-oriented economy during the global slowdown.

This is necessary to deal with what he called the 'changing realities' in the world economy led by the slowdown in China and contractions in the US, Europe and Japan. These changes are likely to lead to further weakness in export demand, on which Singapore's economy is highly dependent.

He said, 'Singapore exports will collapse like everywhere else, so I wouldn't expect anything other than an aggressive reaction from the MAS.'

The central bank shifted to a neutral exchange rate policy last month amid a deep slump in exports.

If exports continue to weaken, economists expect the MAS to intervene again ahead of its meeting next April.

Britain likely in recession

LONDON - THE Bank of England said on Wednesday that the British economy was probably already in recession as a global financial crisis takes its toll.

'The economy probably entered recession in the second half of 2008 and output is likely to contract further,' the central bank said in its latest quarterly report.

Britain's economy shrank 0.5 percent in the three months to Sept from the previous quarter, marking the first contraction since 1992, according to recent official data.

The economy had already shown flat performance in the second quarter with zero growth. However, Britain is not officially in recession unless it reports two quarters running of negative economic growth, or contraction.

The BoE statement implies that the central bank believes that the economy is contracting in the current fourth quarter, or three months to the end of Dec. -- AFP

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

China slowdown fuels fears

EVIDENCE of a weakening Chinese economy and feeble data from Australia and Britain reinforced fears of a prolonged global recession on Tuesday, as policymakers groped for a co-ordinated response to the downturn.

China's inflation fell to a 17-month low of 4 per cent in October, while trade figures were expected to show slowing imports, both serving as signs of a cooling economy and dampening hopes that China's growth will help cushion the impact of the global downturn.

'It shows the Chinese economy is in a sharp slowdown - production is falling, so is demand,' said Mr Zhang Yongjun, an economist with a government think-tank in Beijing, after the inflation data.

A fresh wave of gloom gripped equity markets as investors, already spooked by worries about the darkening outlook for US corporate giants such as Goldman Sachs and Google, dumped shares in Japan, Australia and Hong Kong.

Expectations that profits will be hit hard by a long, deep recession cut short a brief spell of optimism on Monday that had been sparked by China's weekend announcement of a nearly US$600 billion (S$898 billion) stimulus package.

What began as a financial crisis last year, when bank lending dried up in the face of huge losses in the US housing market, is morphing into a broad downturn in the developed world. New powers such as China have been caught up in the domino effect.

A survey of business conditions from National Australia Bank showed confidence at a record low, stoking expectations the country is heading for its first recession since the early 1990s.

'It appears that the continuing volatility in global equity markets, emergency financial packages, falling commodity prices, and talk of global recession have finally broken business optimism and now fear reigns supreme,' said Mr Alan Oster, group chief economist at NAB.

In Japan, exports fell nearly 10 per cent in the first 20 days of October, adding to the evidence that the world's second biggest economy was teetering on the brink of recession.

British retail sales fell for a fifth straight month in October and by the biggest amount in more than three years, a survey released on Tuesday showed.

'These are seriously poor numbers, especially in the run-up to Christmas,' said Mr Stephen Robertson, director general of the British Retail Consortium.

In South Korea, the customs service said exports in the first 10 days of November fell 26 per cent from the same period a year ago.

STOCK MARKETS SAG
Major Asian stock markets fell, with Japan's Nikkei down 3.3 per cent and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 losing 3.9 per cent.

US shares had fallen on Monday after Deutsche Bank said the equity value of once-mighty General Motors was now zero, sending its stock to a 62-year low and analysts warned Goldman could post its first quarterly loss.

Fannie Mae said it was losing money so fast it may need to tap government cash to avoid shutting down as it posted a record US$29 billion quarterly loss.

'It's ugly out there and it's not going to be over tomorrow. It's going to take some time,' said Mr Kurt Brunner, portfolio manager at Swarthmore Group in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

'Talk on the Street about Goldman's numbers, the latest analyst comments on GM - there was just a whole lot of negative corporate news today. Investors are still really nervous.'

Leaders of the world's major economies meet in Washington on Saturday to discuss long-term solutions to the crisis following a series of coordinated moves on interest rates and to recapitalise banks in a bid to fight the financial turmoil.

Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown, a long-time advocate of reforming international financial institutions, said policymakers should seize the opportunity the crisis presented.

'Uniquely in this global age, it is now in our power to come together so that 2008 is remembered not just for the failure of a financial crash that engulfed the world but for the resilience and optimism with which we faced the storm, endured it and prevailed,' he said in a speech in London on Monday night.

The flow of funds through money markets picked up on Monday, indicating that the worst of the global credit freeze may be over and focusing attention on the looming recession.

Bank-to-bank lending rates for dollar, euro and sterling funds, as well as the premium for those funds over expected policy rates mostly fell, and dealers reported a slightly increase in activity.

'The interbank funding market is generally loosening up a bit,' said Mr Ray Stone, economist with Stone & McCarthy Research Associates in Princeton, New Jersey. 'In general, things have been improving.'

But economists see the US economy headed for a recession that will be deeper and last longer than those of 2001 and 1990-1991 according to the monthly Blue Chip Economic Indicators, a closely watched survey.

'Some of our panelists believe it may (rival) the 1981-1982 downturn. ... Job losses seem destined to remain sizeable over coming months as the recession continues to take its toll,' the newsletter said. -- THOMSON REUTERS

Asia faces sharp slowdown

ASIA is staring at a much sharper economic slowdown next year than earlier anticipated because of a deepening global recession, US bank Morgan Stanley said on Tuesday.

The region is now expected to grow by 5.5 per cent in 2009 instead of a previously forecast 6.4 per cent, said Mr Chetan Ahya, a Morgan Stanley economist for South-east Asia and India.

Australia, South Korea, India and Indonesia will be vulnerable to financial contagion because of large current account deficits, while export-dependent countries will also suffer, he said at a news conference.

While downside risks could further drag the forecast growth rate to below 5.0 per cent, it is unlikely to drop near the 2.4 per cent expansion rate seen during the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and 1998, he said.

'The risk right now is it could dip below 5.0 percent,' but not close to the levels of a decade ago, he said.

Mr Ahya added that in 1997 and 1998 the gross domestic product (GDP) of five key Asian economies contracted between 4.0 and 13 per cent, a situation which is unlikely during the current turmoil.

Mr Ahya said the US economy is likely to shrink by 1.3 per cent next year and the European economy should contract by 0.6 per cent, more drastic than earlier projections.

Because of this, 'Asia is unlikely to emerge unscathed in an environment where the global economy is likely to see a deeper recession', Morgan Stanley the bank said in a report.

It said the region's economies will start a 'tepid' rebound in 2010.

The bank projects Asian economies outside Japan to grow by 6.9 per cent in 2010, faster than the forecast global growth rate of 3.6 per cent, but lower than the expected 7.6 per cent expansion in 2008.

'We're not looking for the same kind of (high-growth) environment to come back soon. In that sense, we're looking for the duration of this global risk aversion to be longer than what we had all expected,' Mr Ahya said. -- AFP

S'pore's growth to fall 2%

MORGAN Stanley has slashed its forecast for Singapore's growth next year on the back of a worse-than-expected global slowdown.

It now expects the economy to shrink by 2 per cent next year, after tipping a 0.2 per cent expansion previously.

This is the most bearish forecast so far.

Citigroup's Kit Wei Zheng is the only other economist who has predicted an economic contraction next year, with a forecast of -1.2 per cent growth.

Singapore's full-year economic growth has not dipped below zero since the dot-com bust in 2001, when it shrank 2.4 per cent.

'The global recession is likely to be deeper than expected' and Asia will probably not emerge unscathed, said Morgan Stanley's managing director and India and Asean economist Chetan Ahya.

He expects India, Korea, Indonesia and Australia to be the worst-hit countries in the region, because they have seen strong credit growth in recent years and are running current account deficits. The sudden liquidity crunch has led to a sharp decline in capital inflows and caused a spike in the cost of capital.

Countries that are likely to pull through most strongly in the coming recession include Malaysia, China and Taiwan, he said.

The bank has also cut its forecast for global growth next year to 1.7 per cent, from an earlier estimate of 2.5 per cent.

US in 'serious recession'

WASHINGTON - THE US economy is entering 'the steep part' of what could be the worst recession since World War II, said a member of the panel that gauges American recessions and expansions.

Mr Jeffrey Frankel, part of the business cycle dating committee at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), said in a Bloomberg Television interview on Monday: 'We're in for a pretty serious recession.'

'There's a chance it'll be the worst post-war recession,' he said.

In October, the US lost 240,000 jobs in the 10th straight monthly decline. The unemployment rate jumped to 6.5 per cent, the highest since 1994, the Labour Department said last week. Bloomberg reported that national and regional manufacturing and industrial production shrank to recessionary levels in October.

Fellow NBER committee members Martin Feldstein, a Harvard University professor, and head of the eight-member panel Stanford University economist Robert Hall, have said the US is in a recession.

Professor Hall said in an interview last week that the committee needs more data on gross domestic product before making a recession call.

The US economy shrank at a 0.3 per cent annual rate last quarter, the most since the 2001 downturn, advance Commerce Department figures showed on Oct 30. The department will publish a revised estimate on Nov 25, with a third revision coming in December. The fourth-quarter GDP release is scheduled for late January.

'We're just going into the steep part of it now,' Mr Frankel said. 'We're a little puzzled whether to say that it started last December, because that's when employment peaked, or whether it started in, let's say, October, because that's when the economy really went into a nosedive.'

The NBER panel defines a recession as a 'significant' decrease in activity over a sustained period of time. The decline would be visible in GDP, payrolls, production, sales and incomes, according to the group.

Act 5: Final stage of crisis

LIKE 'all best Shakespearean tragedies', the current financial crisis can be divided into five acts - and it has now reached its fifth and final act, said a former chairman of Britain's financial regulator on Monday.

Sir Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics and Political Science, was speaking at the Institute of Banking and Finance's Distinguished Speaker Series 2008 at the Shangri-La Hotel.

Calling the saga a SLUMP - which stands for Subprime, Liquidity (crunch), Unravelling (of financial institutions), Meltdown (of other banks) and Pumping (in of liquidity into markets) - Sir Davies also likened the current recession to that of the Great Depression.

'We are now in 1931,' declared Sir Davies.

He stopped short of predicting just how deep this recession will go, but noted saliently that data from the International Monetary Fund showed that previous recessions were deeper and somewhat longer when credit was restrained.

Even as governments pump liquidity into the markets today, he is quick to point out the worst may not be over, as market participants 'remain suspicious' despite 'intervention on an absolutely massive scale'.

Noting Shakespearean tragedies usually end with 'lots of blood and dead bodies', Sir Davies said cryptically, 'There's no shortage of blood, or red ink, of banks' balance sheets.

'In the midst of the carnage Shakespeare usually manages to find important messages of redemption or reconciliation for the future. At the moment, it's hard to find the light at the end of the tunnel... and that light may well be an oncoming train.'

Saturday, 8 November 2008

ADB warns of global recession

THE world could easily slide into a global recession, the Asian Development Bank warned on Friday, adding that growth in Asian economies will slow further next year amid weaker demand for their exports.

Recent dismal trade, employment and manufacturing data all point to a shrinking international economy and falling consumer demand for products made in Asia, said ADB Managing Director General Rajat Nag.

'The global slowdown could easily turn into a global recession', Mr Nag said in a speech in Singapore. 'Growth in developing Asia will likely slow further in 2009.'

Governments across the region have slashed growth forecasts this year as a credit crisis that began last year in the US spreads across the globe, battering investor and consumer confidence.

'Asia's economic and financial systems will likely come under increased pressure,' Mr Nag said. 'Asia's export-dependent economies also face a sharp slowdown as global demand weakens.' -- AP

Thursday, 6 November 2008

PERSONALITY TIPS TO IMPROVE YOUR TRADES

Courtesy of Conrad Alvin Lim

Note that the title is not Personal Tips but Personality Tips. This is how you can improve your trades by identifying your personal traits that can either compromise or improve or trading results.



1. Learn To Save

The simple task of saving can be the difference between why a trader succeeds or fails. A saver represents a person with discipline and organization. It proves the ability to manage finances and control spending. Such traits are integral with trading habits and will stand the trader in good stead especially in trying times.



Without this simple discipline, traders tend to over-trade. This usually leads to disorganization and poor financial management. More significantly, it proves that the trader’s intent will not be on trading to trade well but trade to make money. We’ve already discussed how that is not a good mindset to start with. The inability to save translates into needing more money all the time and with this focus, greed will prevail.



Assuming an average person makes S$3,000 a month, less Provident Fund deductions and insurance premiums, this average person should be taking home about S$2,000 every month. A savings habit of just 10% means that S$200 is put aside every month for a rainy day. At the end of one year, this translates into S$2,400 (without factoring in interest gains). This money is just nice to pay for one’s year’s income tax, property tax, road tax and other forced payments to maintain a decent lifestyle.



So in essence, 10% is the minimum an average income earner should be looking at saving every month. The inability to save more than 10% a month means that this average worker will struggle until the time retirement comes knocking. And when it does come knocking, the struggles become worse.



In trading, this is a trader who is Profitable with No Growth.



Learn to save by spending less. Be prudent and frugal. Extravagance only serves to enhance your face and pride but does nothing for your real worth or your net worth.



I’d rather appear to be poor and have lots of money in the bank than look rich with nothing to show for it.



2. Trade What You Can Afford To Lose

In a nutshell, never trade with your children’s trust fund. Such silliness puts a lot of stress on the trader because losing that money is not an option. Under such stress, the trade will not be in the right emotional state and is more likely to make bad decisions or the wrong decisions that will end up in losses.



The losses will only serve to put more pressure on the trader as he tries to recoup his losses and take “revenge” on the market. The losses will continue to mount.



Stress is fear in trading. When one is full of fear, sound decisions and focus are blurred. In order to eliminate this fear, one must trade with money that can be lost. With this mindset, the trader will focus the objective on trading to trade well rather than not losing.



In the first place, trading with your children’s trust fund is a sign of desperation. Trading with money you can’t afford to lose is a dire need for more cash. If you are in this position, don’t trade … you’ll be doing yourself a world of good by staying away from the market rather than think and hope that you’ll get a windfall.



If you can’t afford to trade, then don’t trade.



3. Trade Comfortably

All too often, traders believe that to achieve success as fast as possible, all they need to do is model what other successful traders have done and emulate their trading style. This couldn’t be farther from the truth.



As in life, you must be comfortable with whatever you’re doing. If something doesn’t suit you, you either not do anything or you find ways to adapt it to your needs and style. Emulating someone else’s trading style is definitely not the best way to trade. That style was created by someone else with a totally different mindset and skill set and is best suited to the creator of the style. You may not have the same tolerance, skill nor experience to trade like that. It simply amounts to not knowing what you’re doing and following blindly a style that you hope will work for you as it did for the person you are emulating.



Question; have you noticed that when you emulate someone else, you are only emulating the winning technique and never the loser? So what will you do when something goes wrong?



For some unexplainable reason, everyone wants to emulate the wins but ignores what the successful trader does when faced with a loss.



Learn everything you need to know about trading and adopt your own trading style. When you have your own comfortable and personalized style of trading, you will find it much easier and less stressful to incorporate good habits and practice good financial management.



4. Don’t Be A Clone

One of the most popular ways to learn to trade is to attend workshops. Such workshops usually have one guru who teaches you how he trades and shares his trading strategies and secrets. The common approach is to teach the students how to emulate his style and to follow his rules.



The problem with that is no one is a clone. You cannot be expected to emulate as we’ve so clearly discussed earlier. You can’t blame the guru for teaching as such because he only has three or four days in which to teach you something that took him years to master. Honestly, is that really possible?



The best he can do is to show you how he does it and hope that you can do the same. The results are obvious. While only a handful of his graduates succeed, the rest will falter. The ones who do succeed, you will find, are the ones who can adapt and flex. They don’t become clones.



The majority, sad to say, believe in cloning.



5. Trade What You Know - And Stick To It!

As a trader, the temptation to ditch a consistent and profitable trading style for one that seems better is always going to distract you. Remember that the grass is greener on the other side. But is it really?



Why compromise a profitable style for something new when you are already consistent and profitable? The answer … Greed. Enough said.



The bottom line is that you want to be a profitable trader. That does not mean that you should be the best and most profitable. You only have to be profitable and consistent and you would have achieved your objective. Staying patient and diligent will ensure that. Being unduly adventurous can be costly and sometimes very unrewarding.



Trade what you know, stay consistent and stay focused. And stick to it to avoid getting tempted by greener grass.



As the old saying goes … “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”



6. Stay Current

Books and workshops tend to use dated models. Today’s market is nothing like what it was 10 years ago or for that matter, a year ago. Information and technology is changing the way we do business with every passing minute.



What we know as plastic credit cards will give way to mobile telecommunications being the next form of payment. Telcos of the future will become the next big financial institution. Cash will eventually give way to credit or debit systems and plastic cards will become tiny embedded chips that will fit into lifestyle products like watches, mobile comms and keys. Even keys may change.

The way we work will change. The way we study and learn will change. The way we trade will surely change. The market as we know it is going through a change as I write this and who knows what the new economy will be like.



Books and educational material will become dated quickly in this fast moving environment. Our job is to keep up with the latest and never fall behind for reading and believing obsolete material.



Stay current, stay informed and always be on the cutting edge of your business.

The terrible truth about the coming global redundancies

Sarah Butcher

It’s becoming harder to find a bank that hasn’t already laid off at least 10% of its staff. But with revenues still catastrophically low, headcount reductions to date could prove a pinprick compared to what’s coming next. Based on average pay per head for the year so far, we’ve calculated how many more people each bank would need to cut in order to maintain its international compensation ratio (compensation costs as a percentage of revenues) in line with 2007. The results range from the farcical (Merrill Lynch) to the disturbing (Credit Suisse), and the reassuring (Goldman and Morgan Stanley). While the vast majority of the cuts so far have been in the US and Europe, the layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio should make bankers in Asia nervous about the future, too.

Merrill Lynch

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $834m; 2007 – $19,442m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,170m; 2007 – $11,564m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 1,339%; 2007 – 59%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 60,900; 2007 – 64,200

Average comp per head: 2008 – $183k

Layoffs over the past year: 3,300

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 58,195

Credit Suisse (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF2,736m; 2007 – CHF16,217m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF5,682m; 2007 – CHF8,111m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 207%; 2007 – 50%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 21,300; 2007 – 20,399

Average comp per head: CHF266k (US$228k)

Layoffs over the past year: None; 1,000 staff added*

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 16,161

Deutsche Bank

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – €6,102m; 2007 – €14,620m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – €3,250m; 2007 – €5,217m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 53%, 2007 – 36%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 15,574; 2007 – 17,215

Average comp per head: 2008 – €209k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,668

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,130

UBS

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – minus CHF21,418m; 2007 – CHF11,065m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF4,589m; 2007 – CHF8,326m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – unquantifiable; 2007 – 75.2%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 18,901; 2007 – 22,666

Average comp per head: 2008 – CHF243k (US$208k)

Layoffs over the past year: 3,765**

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: Everyone

JPMorgan (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $12,516m; 2007 – $14,998m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $6,535m; 2007 – $6,404m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 52%; 2007 – 43%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 30,989; 2007 – 25,961

Average comp per head: 2008 – $211k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 5,298 staff added

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,647

Morgan Stanley

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $22,881m; 2007 – $28,476m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $10,726m; 2007 – $13,365m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 46.9%; 2007 – 46.9%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 46,383; 2007 – 47,713

Average comp per head: $231k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,330

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

Goldman Sachs

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $23,800m; 2007 – $35,246m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,424m; 2007 – $16,918m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 48%; 2007 – 48%

Headcount Q1-Q3: 2008 – 32,569; 2007 – 29,905

Average comp per head: 2008 – $351k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 2,664 staff added***

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

• *Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 500 layoffs announced in October

• ** Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307; excluding 1,901 layoffs announced in October

• ***Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 3,200 layoffs announced in October

'Financial crisis: It's not time to be fearful. Its time to be greedy'

THE current financial crisis has seen people dreadfully fearful of the stock market. Investors, now more than ever, are so afraid of touching the stock market that they have either sold all the stocks they own or simply stopped looking at the prices of their stocks.

People have seen the value of their equities drop in half and many say they'll never touch the markets again.

But they're doing exactly the wrong thing. As an investor, one's objective in the stock market is to "buy low and sell high". However, most people act contrary to that.

When the markets are bustling, more and more people start taking to it. Looking back to the technology boom of the late 1990s, the higher prices got, the more people wanted to buy. You see your neighbour earn 100 per cent returns with a particular stock and you can't bear to "miss out" on the opportunity of a lifetime.

Euphoria sets the stage for irrational buying. In two months, your stocks go up 50 per cent, and you're delighted.

Then all of a sudden, the bubble bursts. The market plunges, and the stock is now at 30 per cent below the price you paid. You think you better be smart and "cut your losses". So you sell all your stocks and feel relieved that you're now "safe". But effectively, you've just bought high and sold low.

Most average investors do not have the appropriate technical knowledge to constantly beat the market through timing. Because of that, one must be able to invest for the long-term.

Short-term speculation is a sure way to make consistent losses. This means, you should only invest money you do not need for the next couple of years. You never know precisely when the market is going to crash, so you need some sort of holding power.

In addition, you need to be level-headed. One must have the wisdom to avoid the market frenzy and curtail buying during irrational market highs.

Similarly, one has to have the guts to invest at market bottoms. There is no point trying to guess exactly where each peak or trough is, so don't bother.

The only thing that you know now is that the markets are irrationally low and a lot of stocks are going at bargain prices. So that means only one thing: It's time to buy. Eventually, the market will rebound and you will make your profits. It's not time to be fearful. Its time to be greedy.

Shaun Lim

Monday, 3 November 2008

Just how safe is your job?

The five riskiest sectors

# Banking and finance

Considering the root of this crisis was in the banking and finance sector, its employees face the biggest risk of layoffs as the industry consolidates.

This difficult period will last for at least one to two years, say analysts.

Investment bankers, stock traders, analysts and bank tellers are particularly vulnerable, compared to those in specific functional roles such as risk, control and operations.

Some financial institutions are also turning to contract hiring as a way to fill back-end positions to keep costs down.

Any jobs considered to be support roles, or non-essential, may also be among the first to go, added analysts.

# Tourism and services

As consumer spending slows in tandem with the economic slide, the services and tourism industry is expected to take a significant hit.

With customers tightening their belts, employers in this sector may have to cut costs by laying off staff from businesses such as hotels and travel agencies.

Visitor arrivals have suffered four months of decline, so tourism will also be hit as regional travellers forgo holidays here.

Other workers who are at risk include semi-skilled and unskilled workers such as cleaners and waiters.

# Luxury and retail

During bad times, in-your-face luxury 'is suddenly very passe', analysts say.

Consumers are likely to cut back on luxury goods while high-end stores and luxury brands scale back staff numbers to reduce costs, they say.

The credit squeeze is likely to continue exerting pressure on consumer spending, so employment, salaries and bonuses in this industry could take a hit.

# Manufacturing

Singapore's manufacturing production numbers have been sliding because of weakening demand for exports.

Electronics, which makes up 30 per cent of Singapore's manufacturing sector, is expected to slide further as firms scale down information technology spending and defer outlays on tech upgrades.

Jobs in the manufacturing sector are vulnerable as a fall in demand could cause firms to scale back to cut costs.

# Transport and aviation

As consumers adopt a more conservative outlook and tighten their belts, demand for transport services such as taxis and flights is likely to be affected.

Fuel prices and falling demand could also take a toll on airline profits.

Carriers in the United States and India have already reported plans to retrench staff, including pilots, stewards and baggage handlers.


Five low-risk sectors

# Law

The legal profession is still seeing strong demand. In the current economic climate, analysts see a shift in terms of skill sets required, with a stronger call for insolvency and bankruptcy lawyers.

# Accountancy

As the finance industry consolidates, demand remains healthy for accountants, particularly cost management executives and those skilled in tax restructuring and managing distressed assets.

# Public sector, including teachers

The public service sector has always been a 'relatively stable sector' and remains the largest employer in Singapore, says recruitment firm Robert Walters.

Education is generally not affected by economic volatility, so teaching jobs, in particular, are relatively safe.

# Health care

Health care is generally regarded as recession-proof, although this depends on the nature of the service provided.

Optional surgical procedures such as cosmetic enhancements and dental services not covered by health insurance are likely to see a fall in demand.

The employment prospects for other occupations such as doctors, medical assistants and nurses are likely to remain stable.

# Energy

Countries will still need energy to run, so jobs related to oil and gas, and alternative, renewable energy are likely to remain relatively stable.

With the growth of climate change awareness fuelling a demand for 'green' skills in the energy sector, this industry is tipped to remain strong despite the current economic slowdown.

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Emerging economies to be hit

VIENNA - EMERGING economies will be the next to topple in the global financial crisis, the head of the International Monetary Fund Dominique Strauss-Kahn wrote in article published here on Friday.

Emerging countries are facing additional problems, Mr Strauss-Kahn wrote in a guest commentary for the daily Der Standard.

Their economies 'aren't just facing falling exports and tumbling confidence,' he said.

'They're the latest victims of a financial crisis that started in the United States and spread to Europe and is now moving beyond Europe's borders.'

Ironically, the measures taken in highly industrialised countries to resolve the crisis - such as banking bailouts - 'make it more attractive for investors to recall their money back home.

'But it is precisely that which is making life so difficult for the emerging countries,' Mr Strauss-Kahn argued.

In order to support their financial systems and overall economic demand, emerging countries also needed to take similar measures.

'But the newly acquired prosperity of many of these countries relies on access to global capital. And when this suddenly dries up, it deals a heavy blow to those countries and brings with it very major challenges, which they can't overcome on their own,' the IMF chief wrote.

Highly developed countries must be prepared to take over the responsibility of financing the measures 'in proportions never seen before,' he said.

The alternative, Mr Strauss-Kahn warned, would be widespread payment default, protectionism and banking controls.

'That will set not only these countries, but the entire world economy back years,' he argued. -- AFP

5 Questions to Ask Your Financial Planner

by Kimberly Lankford

Like everyone else, my investments have lost a lot of money recently. I work with a financial planner, and I'm wondering how much of it is his fault and how much is happening across the market. How can I find out if my financial planner has really been doing his job through all of this?

This is a great time to assess the help you've been getting from your financial planner. Everyone's been losing money, so you shouldn't be unnecessarily harsh on your planner just for having a negative return. But some planners may use the widespread downturn to hide big mistakes. Here are some key questions to help you determine how your financial planner really stacks up during these volatile times.

1. How have my investments actually performed? It's scary to watch the Dow drop by more than 700 points in one day. But how does that compare with your own investments? "To some extent, everyone is seeing market losses right now," says John Gannon, senior vice president of investor education for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). "But it's really an important time to open your account statements and take a look at them and benchmark your performance."

Ask your financial adviser to compare the performance of your investments to relevant indexes or to other funds with similar investing strategies -- focusing on the past few months and years, not the day-to-day gyrations. If your investments are doing much worse than those benchmarks, then your adviser may have made some bad choices. If they're doing a lot better, is it because the adviser made some good decisions or lucked out on some risky investments? Ask for a detailed explanation.

Also ask about the performance of your overall portfolio, focusing on the past one, three and five years. "I really feel that no financial-planning client or investment advisory client should be doing as badly as the markets; that is, if the broad market is down 25%, then they should be down no more than 20% and probably less," says Bob Veres, publisher of Inside Information, a well-respected newsletter for financial planners. "The best advisers always make sure their clients keep enough cash and ultra-safe bonds on hand that nobody has to sell stocks into the teeth of a bear for two years." Your adviser also should have ensured your portfolio was diversified. If not, it would be a "a reliable sign of incompetence," Veres says.

2. How do my investments match my time frame and goals? One of the biggest benefits of working with a financial planner is that he or she should pick investments within the context of your overall financial plan -- dividing your savings into several sections and selecting the investments for each based on your time frame and goals. That way, you can keep your long-term money primarily in stocks and stock funds for future growth but don't need to sell when they're down to cover your bills.

"You never have the money you need for this year exposed to any risk," says Mark Johannessen, a certified financial planner in McLean, Va., and president of the Financial Planning Association. Ask the adviser how he or she decided how much of an emergency fund you should have, where it's invested and how liquid it is.

And ask about the adviser's strategy for meeting your medium-term goals. "Our retired clients have five to eight years' worth of certainty in their portfolios" with investments such as Treasury bonds, municipal bonds, diversified bond portfolios, bond ETFs and CDs, Johannessen says. "You always want your retired clients to sleep at night and not worry about getting up in the morning and turning on CNBC."

3. What adjustments are you making because of this market? "A good adviser will have put a plan in place that expects horrible times in the markets," says Daniel Moisand, a certified financial planner in Melbourne, Fla., and chairman of the Certified Financial Planner Board's disciplinary and ethics commission. "If you found yourself clueless that your portfolio could drop, you have to consider whether you were well prepped by your adviser in the first place or whether he or she failed to fulfill a promise."

The adviser shouldn't make rash decisions during a market downturn, especially if you've been well-diversified and your investments match your time frame and goals. "Any adviser who says you should sell everything during the capitulation period of a bear market is not somebody I would want to work with," Veres says.

But the adviser should be making some changes to take advantage of the situation. "What you're looking for is an advisor who sees opportunities to offset capital gains with losses, provides better diversification and advises against making wholesale changes until the market has regained its stability. I would look for an adviser who recommends cautious additions to your equity exposure during this downturn," he says.

Veres recommends asking advisers about other downturns they've experienced in their careers and what they learned from them. "The only right answer is that the market always recovers, always unexpectedly, and it's always better to raise equity exposure at times when your gut is telling you to do just the opposite," he says. "The downturns are always different, never predictable ... and in the end they make it possible for professional and wise investors to buy stocks at prices that normally would not be available."

4. How much am I paying for guarantees? Some "advisers" may offer to eliminate future worries by selling a product promising big guarantees. "I would be highly skeptical of any product pitches that purport to have severed the relationship between risk and reward," says Moisand. "You'll see a lot of advertising for bonus CDs, annuities and indexed annuities in particular. Most of these things are safer from a market volatility perspective but come at significant prices people don't understand and wouldn't pay if they were not under duress from the market losses."

In some cases, the adviser may be preying on your fear of losing money just to earn a big commission on a product that might not be appropriate for you. Ask how the product works, how much it costs per year, how much access you have to the money, and how much the adviser receives in commission. Read FINRA's Investor Alerts for more information about these types of investments.

5. How do you plan to keep me updated and answer questions? You can learn a lot about your financial planner during this crisis -- not just how he or she manages your investments, but how well the adviser explains the situation and what action you should take, answers your questions and makes you feel more comfortable. "This is probably the time when you need your financial professional more than at any other time," says Gannon.

And your adviser should be giving you the attention you deserve now. "The very best advisers cannot help but feel an empathetic connection with their clients, cannot help but feel your sense of loss and anxiety, and will not be able to help wanting to address and alleviate it," Veres says. "In many cases, they will also tell you that they, too, are anxious and concerned, and that they -- like the rest of us -- don't yet know how it's all going to turn out, but they're monitoring it on your behalf and will do your worrying for you."

Copyrighted, Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.

Get Ready For 'Stag-Deflation'

Nouriel Roubini 10.30.08, 12:01 AM ET

Back in January, I argued that four major forces would lead to a risk of deflation-- or "stag-deflation," where a recession would be associated with deflationary forces--rather than the inflation that mainstream analysts have worried about.

They were: (1) a slack in goods markets, (2) a re-coupling of the rest of the world with the U.S. recession, (3) a slack in labor markets, and (4) a sharp fall in commodity prices following such U.S. and global contraction, which would reduce inflationary forces and lead to deflationary forces in the global economy.

How has such argument fared over time? And will the U.S. and global economies soon face sharp deflationary pressures? The answer: Deflation and stag-deflation will, in six months, become the main concern of policy authorities.

Why?

First, the U.S. has entered a severe recession that is already leading to deflationary forces in sectors where supply vastly exceeds demand (housing, consumer durables, motor vehicles, etc.). Aggregate demand is falling sharply below aggregate supply. The unemployment rate is up sharply, while employment has been falling for 10 months in a row. And commodity prices are sharply down--about 30% from their July peak--in the last three months, and are likely to fall much more in the next few months as the advanced economies' recession goes global. So both in the U.S. and in other advanced economies we are clearly headed toward a collapse of headline and core inflation.

Is there any doubt about this ongoing inflation capitulation and the beginning of sharp deflationary forces? Take the current views of the economic research group at JPMorgan Chase. This group was, in 2007-08, the leading voice arguing about the risks of rising global inflation and the associated risks of a global growth reflation, and that policy rates would be sharply increased in 2008-09.

This week, however, the JPMorgan research group published its latest global economic outlook, arguing that we are headed toward a global recession, negative global inflation and sharply lower policy rates in the U.S. and advanced economies--a 180-degree turn from its previous position. What a difference a year makes!

Do you have any further doubt that we're headed toward a global deflation or--better--a global stag-deflation? Read on: Aggregate demand is now collapsing in the U.S. and advanced economies, and sharply decelerating in emerging markets. There is a huge excess capacity for the production of manufactured goods in the global economy, as the massive, and excessive, capital expenditure in China and Asia (Chinese real investment is now close to 50% of gross domestic product) has created an excess supply of goods that will remain unsold as global aggregate demand falls.

Commodity prices are in free fall, with oil prices alone down over 50% from their July peak (and the Baltic Freight Index--the best measure of international shipping costs--is 90% down from its peak in May). Finally, labor market slack is sharply rising in the U.S., and rising, as well, in Europe and other advanced economies.

Next question: What are financial markets telling us about the risks of stag-deflation?

First, yields on 10-year Treasury bonds have fallen by about 50 basis points since Oct. 14, getting close to their previous 2008 lows. Also, the two-year Treasury yield has fallen by about 150 basis points in the last month.

Second, gold prices--a typical hedge against rising global inflation--are now sharply falling.

Finally, and more important, yields on Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) due in five years or less have now become higher than yields on conventional Treasuries of similar maturity. The difference between yields on five-year Treasuries and five-year TIPS, known as the break-even rate, fell to minus 0.43 percentage points.

This is a record. Since the difference between the conventional Treasuries and TIPS is a proxy for expected inflation, the TIPS market is now signaling that investors expect inflation to be negative over the next five years, as a severe recession is ahead of us.

So goods, labor, commodity, financial and bond markets are all sending the same message: Stagnation/recession and deflation (or stag-deflation) is ahead of us.

Don't be surprised, then, if six months from now the Fed and other central banks in advanced economies will start to worry--as they did in 2002-03 after the 2001 recession--about deflation rather than inflation. In those years, when the U.S. experienced a deflation scare, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke wrote several pieces explaining how the U.S. could resort to very unorthodox policy actions to prevent a deflation and a liquidity trap like the one experienced by Japan in the 1990s. Those writings may, very soon, have to be carefully read and studied again.

Finally, while in the short run a global recession will be associated with deflationary forces, some ask whether we should worry about rising inflation in the middle run? This argument--that the financial crisis will eventually lead to inflation--is based on the view that governments will be tempted to monetize the fiscal costs of bailing out the financial system, and that this sharp growth in the monetary base will eventually cause high inflation.

In a variant of the same argument, some posit that--as the U.S. and other economies face debt deflation--it would make sense to reduce the debt burden of borrowers (households and, now, governments taking on their balance sheets the losses of the private sector) by wiping out the real value of such nominal debt with inflation.

So should we worry that this financial crisis and its fiscal costs will eventually lead to higher inflation? The answer to this complex question: likely not.

First, the massive injection of liquidity in the financial system--literally trillions of dollars in the last few months--is not inflationary, as it accommodates the demand for liquidity that the current financial crisis and investors' panic have triggered. Thus, once the panic recedes and this excess demand for liquidity shrinks, central banks can and will mop up all this excess liquidity.

Second, the fiscal costs of bailing out financial institutions would eventually lead to inflation if the increased budget deficits associated with this bailout were to be monetized, as opposed to financed with a larger stock of public debt. As long as such deficits are financed with debt--rather than by the printing presses--such fiscal costs will not be inflationary, as taxes will have to be increased over the next few decades and/or government spending reduced to service this large increase in the stock of public debt.

Third, to the question raised earlier: Wouldn't central banks be tempted to monetize these fiscal costs--rather than allow a mushrooming of public debt--and thus wipe out with inflation these fiscal costs of bailing out lenders/investors and borrowers? Not likely in my view. Even a relatively dovish Bernanke Fed cannot afford to let the inflation-expectations genie out of the bottle via a monetization of the fiscal bailout costs. It cannot afford to do that because a rise in inflation expectations will eventually force a nasty and severely recessionary Volcker-style monetary-policy tightening to get the genie back into its bottle.

Fourth, inflation can reduce the real value of debts as long as it is unexpected, and as long as debt is in the form of long-term nominal fixed-rate liabilities. An attempt to increase inflation would not be unexpected: Investors would write debt contracts to hedge against such a risk if monetization of the fiscal deficits does occur.

Also, in the U.S. economy, a lot of debts--of the government, of the banks, of the households--are not long-term nominal fixed-rate liabilities. They are, rather, shorter-term variable-rate debts. Thus, a rise in inflation in an attempt to wipe out debt liabilities would lead to a rapid repricing of such shorter term, variable-rate debt. And thus expected inflation would not succeed in reducing the part of the debts that are now of the long-term nominal fixed-rate form--i.e., you can fool all of the people some of the time (unexpected inflation) and some of the people all of the time (those with long-term nominal fixed-rate claims), but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.

In conclusion, a sharp slack in goods, labor and commodity markets will lead to global deflationary trends over the next year. And the fiscal costs of bailing out borrowers and/or lenders/investors will not be inflationary, as central banks will not be willing to incur the costs of very high inflation as a way to reduce the real value of the debt burdens of governments and distressed borrowers. The costs of rising expected inflation will be much higher than the benefits of using the inflation tax to pay for the fiscal costs of cleaning up the mess that this most severe financial crisis has created.

Goldman Sachs Information, Comments, Opinions and Facts